Precise News Ticker

Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label climate change. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

The global warming scientific establishment is starting to look like the final days of the Soviet Union...




AmericanThinker: The global warming scientific establishment is starting to look like the final days of the Soviet Union... http://t.co/CgtgAxJdMp

- Jeremy Buchanan Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Saturday, March 30, 2013

'Where's the warming?' goes mainstream




AmericanThinker: 'Where's the warming?' goes mainstream http://t.co/aY1p0UlNLl

- Jeremy Buchanan Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Monday, March 25, 2013

Thursday, March 21, 2013

The Left's Fake Science on Global Warming





RedState: The Left's Fake Science on Global Warming http://t.co/X6VN7RNYOf

- Jeremy Buchanan Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Monday, March 18, 2013

Delaying the Great, Green Luxury Tax




RedState: Delaying the Great, Green Luxury Tax http://t.co/eDM8Q3oiMS


- Jeremy Buchanan Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Sunday, March 17, 2013

Skeeter to push his Climate Change delusion onto all Federal Agencies




TheRightScoop: Skeeter to push his Climate Change delusion onto all Federal Agencies http://t.co/U9RYuMTUxw


- Jeremy Buchanan Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Climate Change Update: Something is happening with the sun




TheRightScoop: Climate Change Update: Something is happening with the sun. http://t.co/zmx9EMVf27


- Jeremy Buchanan Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Alternate New York Times Headline: 'Global Warming Saves Civilization'





RedState: Alternate New York Times Headline: 'Global Warming Saves Civilization' http://t.co/fc2saLyY61

- Jeremy Buchanan Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Friday, March 8, 2013

Sunday, July 29, 2012

What I Know About Global Warming aka Climate Change


Beginning with a series of fictitious ecology books in the sixties, the institution of Earth Day in the Seventies, the rise of Al Gore in the Eighties, the Rio Earth Summit and subsequent U.N.-sponsored global warming scare campaign in the Nineties, and the relentless media onslaught proclaiming climate change in the new millennium, we have now been herded to the edge of a dangerous precipice, and, with the selection of Barack Obama as president, the powers that be are attempting to shove us over the brink.

Forcing folks to spread their wealth around is socialism, while sharing is akin to charity---not communism.

The earth is not warming, and climate is always changes---and they know it.  But they are assuming there are enough ignorant fools they can horn-swoggle into believing that any climatic alterations, including extreme weather events like hurricanes or floods, are being caused by mankind.  Global warming is the grandest of all tyrannical schemes. 

Rachel Carson’s 1962 best seller, Silent Spring – Targeted DDT or dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane

In 1972, the pressure created by Silent Spring was the impetus for banning DDT domestically and internationally, eventually leading to the deaths of millions from malaria.

Paul Ehrlich’s 1968 Population Bomb – Long opined the earth is being forced to support too many people, who require too many resourses and produce too much pollution.

Ehrlich’s conviction has always boiled down to people being the problem---there are just too damned many of them---and his final solution has always been clear:  “Population control is the only answer.”

Since the DDT ban in 1973, malaria has killed 96 million people. 

Abortion, the termination method of choice for over 1 million pregnancies each year in the U.S. alone, is fully promoted and sanctioned by the government and medical profession alike.  The math adds up to over 250 million people eliminated in less than forty years.

In January 1969, a Union Oil drilling platform six miles off the coast of Santa Barbara, CA, sprang a leak, allowing hundreds of thousands of gallons of crude oil to seep into the Pacific and wash ashore.

The Nation’s first outspoken congressional environmentalist, Wisconsin Senator Gaylord Nelson

Emotions still run high in ultraliberal Santa Barbara over the 1969 leak.  Even today, as black, marble-sized balls of coagulated crude are often found interspersed on the beaches of Santa Barbara, deceptive local activists will direct naive eyes towards the oil platforms offshore, fervently declaring that capitalism and big oil are to blame for the tar balls on their sand---but this observation is a total fraud.  There is so much oil just beneath the ocean floor off Santa Barbara, that black gold is constantly seeping into the open waters at a rate of 170 barrels per day.  However, despite the vast supply of crude naturally bubbling up from the deep, all these years later the 1969 accident has fixed it in the minds of many that drilling for oil is dreadful, and we should feel guilty for using the gooey fossil fuel---period.

Fed up, bummed out, searching for answers and seeking a collective together, in August 1969, 200,000 antiestablishment, young hippies trekked to a farm in upstate New York for the three-day Woodstock Music and Art Fair.  The Event, which the hippies referred to as being the climax to the “summer of love”, represented the largest rock concert to date, with most of the musicians utilizing the stage to fuel the fires of rebellious change.  Millions who could not attend purchased the ensuing soundtrack and viewed the concert’s documentary in theatres across the country.  Woodstock represented a new ethos defined by sex, dope, rock and roll, and loathing of mom and dad’s America.

Cleverly realizing the war protests were a moment in time, their focus would soon return to “saving the planet from pollution”---a plot that would provide their lot with a long-term momentum.

Senator Nelson and Dennis Hayes created a national teach-in day on the environment called Earth Day in the spring of 1970 on April 22nd.  Which Coincided with the 100th anniversary of the birth of Lennin.

Lennin’s core philosophy was linked at the hip with these newly fangled environmentalists who maintained that America’s government must be altered, its economy planned and regulated, and its citizens better controlled.  The environment would be the perfect tool to force these changes, and the most efficient way to gain converts would be through the public school system---the earlier the better.

Earth Day has never been a celebration of God’s woderful creation; instead it’s always been an assault on man.  “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources,” championed the New York Times in an April 23, 1970, Editorial, “not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.”

By the Eighties the event’s organizers cast man as the tree killer, and, with the Nineties, man evolved into the animal species annihilator.  The Global warming scare never really became popular until the late Nineties, and when it did, it provided a hook that the compatriots at the Earth Day headquarters could hang their red berets on. 

In November of 2009, Over a thousand emails leaked from an internal computer system within the Climate Research Unit at the University of the East Anglia in the United Kingdom, reveal how a small group of highly influential British and U.S. scientists have for years been secretly discussing ways in which their research could be maneuvered to make their case for human-caused Climate Change.

The Climate Research Unit (CRU) had been regarded by many as one of the most credible atmospheric institutions in the world, but with the revelation of the email exchanges, their credibility was reduced to junk science.  The emails reveal that the world’s leading climate scientists were working together to block Freedom of Information requests to review their data; marginalize dissenting scientists; manipulate the peer-review process; and obscure, massage, or delete inconvenient temperature readings.  One certainly wonders, why?  Especially since Al Gore has assured the world that “the science is settled.”

The problem with every generation is that a long-term memory of the past requires a determined and studied effort---a fact upon which modern eco-Marxists depend for success.  In this age of information/false information overload, even the recent past quickly becomes fuzzy, almost guaranteeing a headache to anyone who racks his brain digging deeply to mine true facts and details.  And that’s precisely what the current climate-scare tacticians are banking on, especially the elitist politicians and policymakers who continually capitalize on a society’s lack of cognizance---the bigger the public’s memory hole, the better.  They see it as an effective means to grow government and thus, better control the way in which the underclass lives.  In addition to the deceivers in government, unscrupulous scientific researchers are dependent on perpetuating the global warming and climate change myth for continued flows of grant money.  Colleges and universities have established curricula and majors to indoctrinate an entire generation to enlist in the so-called “green workforce.” Without a crisis, many politicians, researchers, educators, and graduates are with a cause.

However, contrary to Marx history does produce great wealth and can win battles---especially in the climate debate---because, climate happens, without the influence of man.

Little Ice Age or LIA

Frozen Pilgrims Cape Cod Massachusetts – late 1700s

The Medieval Warm Period or MWP  900 – 1300 A.D.

During the MWP, the overall average mean global temperature was considerably warmer than present.  There were no SUVs, smokestacks, or airplanes seeping the currently vilified, ever so minor greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.  The MWP was a dramatic climatic event that just happened.

Michael Mann’s hockey stick cleverly “used” the highly respected tree ring research as his primary data to account for the medieval years.  For more recent centuries, Mann included other measurements from sea sediment, ice core samples, and oxygen isotopes---all sound, legitimate sources.  However, Mann’s process began waxing weird when he threw into the mix temperatures recorded in major cities that have undergone huge artificially-induced upward swings due to the hear-trapping influences of concrete, asphalt and steel (known as the Urban Heat Island effect).  Stranger still, conveniently excluded was the highly accurate temperature record of the earth produced by flawless satellite instrumentation that demonstrates only a miniscule warming since 1979.  In addition, Mann did not discard wild temperature anomalies like the monster El Nino warming of 1982-1983 and 1997-1998.

In the end, Mann’s results seemed to justify his means.  Through a stupefying, number-crunching mathematical exercise, he meticulously manipulated the data collected through the diligent labor of the dedicated scientists who preceded him.  The result was like an ice pick to the climate’s prefrontal cortex: the past had been forgotten.  Mann’s work was presented to the world in a paper published in Nature and in another published in Geophysical Research Letters.  For the global whiners, the papers were like manna from Heaven.

“Mann’s Hockey Stick” graph became a popular devious device to convince the uninformed observer that the earth was undergoing an unprecedented fever.

Observing Mann’s Stick, one can clearly see a dramatized temperature spike ensuing about 1930 and reaching warp-speed about 1970.  Also, note that the Medieval Warm Period between 900 and 1300 and its counter-part, the Little Ice Age, have been expunged from the record. 

Despite a horrendous bastardization of science, Mann’s Hockey Stick has been accepted by millions.  The United Nations still carries the Stick to compel global policy, while Al Gore carries it to the bank.  The Stick is a pillar in his media presentations.  And to this day, those who dare criticize the spurious Stick are branded “outliers.”

Responsible science is built on skepticism.

Gore and Hansen led the ignorant to believe that this is the hottest weather ever, blaming it all on the rampant production of carbon dioxide caused by man’s insatiable appetite for fossil fuels.

CO2 Only accounts for less than 1 percent of the gases in the earth’s atmosphere and of that sliver, only 3 percent is created through anthropogenic means.  Additionally,, carbon dioxide has been steadily increasing at a snail’s pace since the end of the Little Ice Age, the claim that the gas caused a post-1970 hockey spike and the hottest temperatures ever is pure chicanery.

Interestingly, so many of the global warming hawkers get the warmest years wrong.  In both his film and on the road, Al Gore has claimed “If you look at the ten hottest years ever measured, they’ve all occurred in the last fourteen years.  And the hottest of all was 2005.  Does 2005 even appear in the top ten?  No.  2005 is actually number 16, I honestly don’t know where Gore obtains his data.

1.1934 2.1998 3.1921 4. 2006 5. 1931 6. 1999 7. 1953 8. 1990 9. 1938 10. 1954

11. 1939 12. 1987 13. 2001 14. 2007 15. 1986 16. 2005 17. 1946 18. 1991 19. 1933 20. 1981

The difficult decision Gore recommended was imposing upon the populace an immediate cap on the nation’s carbon dioxide emissions and commanding further reductions of 90% or more (from today’s levels) by 2050.  Such legislation should cause one’s “moral imagination” to envision life in a third-world gulag.

According to the Census Bureau, we experience a net gain of one person every thirteen seconds, which equals 6,646 new people in this country daily and nearly 2.5 million annually.

Carbon Dioxide is Not a Pollutant; it’s a vital fertilizer essential to life.  In fact, it’s no more deadly than water and oxygen.

Like water and oxygen, there is a finite amount and yet an infinite supply of carbon dioxide.  In other words, we are not losing any to outer space, nor is any being added from deliveries by extraterrestrials.  The CO2 that is here, is here---and it’s not going away---it will just be stored in different places. 

Observe the wonderful symbiotic relationship among humans, animals, and plants.  Humans, and the various species of animals, breathe in the oxygen produced by plants.  A wondrous transformation then materializes in our lungs, causing us to exhale CO2, which the plants then “breathe.”  Just as fascinating is the relationship plants have with the planet’s various other sources of CO2.  And the more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the more content the plants become---just ask anyone who has worked in a greenhouse.

The plant kingdom would abound if carbon dioxide levels were to increase in the global atmosphere.

The effects of carbon dioxide on trees, which over one-third of Earth’s land mass, may be even more dramatic.  According to Michigan State’s forestry department, trees have been raised to maturity in months instead of years when the seedlings were raised in a tripled CO2 environment.

So how could an element so essential to life be vilified as evil?

It’s astounding to note that, of the gases in our atmosphere, the amount of carbon dioxide is almost imperceptible.  By percentage, the gases are ordered as follows:  Nitrogen 78.1%, Oxygen 20.9%, Water Vapor .40% and Argon .9%

THEN......

Carbon Dioxide .08%, Neon .002%, Helium .005%, Methane .002%, Krypton .001%, Hydrogen .0005%, Nitrous Oxide .0003%, Ozone .00004% and Carbon Monoxide just a trace.

Carbon Dioxide only accounts for a scant 38 thousandths of a percent of our planet’s atmosphere.  It is known as a variable gas becasue, like water vapor, it has historically fluctuated. 

Carbon Dioxide comprises 38/1000ths of the earth’s atmosphere, and of that amount, a mere 3 percent is generated by mankind as indicated by the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center.

The contribution of CO2 emissions created by human activity accounts for only 2.32 percent of the earth’s greenhouse effect.  When we consider water vapor into the math, the anthropogenic carbon dioxide footprint is reduced to a mere .116 percent of the greenhouse effect.

  1.  CO2 comprises .038 percent of the earth’s atmosphere, and of that amount, a mere 3 percent is generated by mankind.
  2. CO2 emissions created by human activity account for .116 percent of the greenhouse effect.
  3. Since the end of the Little Ice Age (150 years ago) the amount of carbon dioxide has increased 35 percent, well within historical norms.

Water is a resource that is finite yet infinite----it’s a zero-sum game.  CO2 works the same way, with one exception; the CO2 circuit requires more time to complete.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Cap & Trade aka The Climate Bill or as I Like to Call it "Tax and Kill"


I'm SO Against The Current Cap & Trade Climate Bill that Passed in the House of Congress and is Still Currently in the Senate Waiting to be Pushed through into Legislation.
I DO Call it "Tax and Kill"!
That is EXACTLY What it SHOULD be Called!
That's what this Climate Bill Will Ultimately do to America!
It Will be an MASSIVE ENERGY TAX on Every American Citizen!
It Will NOT Make A Substantive Impact on the Environment!
It Will KILL JOBS!
It Will Cause Electricity Bills and Gas Prices to Sharply Increase!
It Will Outsource Manufacturing Jobs and Hurt Free Trade!
It Will Make You Choose Between Energy, Groceries, Clothing or Haircuts!
It Will Be Highly Susceptible to Fraud and Corruption!
It Will Hurt Senior Citizens, the Poor, and the Unemployed the Worst!
It Will Cost American Families Over $3,000 a Year!
President Obama Admitted “Electricity Rates Would Necessarily Skyrocket” under a Cap-and-Trade program! (January 2008)
Are You Scared or Worried Yet? Well You SHOULD Be!

The House Already has Passed this Bill. Now it just needs to go through the Senate and then finally the President has to sign it into Law. And Believe Me when I Tell You that Obama is Anxiously and Impatiently Waiting to Sign This Legislation into Law too!
What Would Global Warming Regulations Do?
■Lieberman-Warner: Last year, the Senate rejected cap-and-tax legislation that would have capped CO2 emissions 70% below 2005 levels by 2050. A Heritage analysis of that bill found startling economic impacts.
■Markey-Waxman: The cap-and-trade tax proposed by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA) would double down on last year’s failed scheme, bringing in trillions of dollars in taxes, making it one of the largest sources of revenue for the federal government.
■Six Hundred Hurricanes Couldn’t Cause This Much Economic Damage: In the first 20 years, Lieberman-Warner would have destroyed nearly 3 million jobs, caused some manufacturing sectors to cut jobs by 50% and generated up to $300 billion per year in government revenue while reducing income by nearly $5 trillion. For comparison, this is equal to the economic damage done by over 600 hurricanes …and the Markey-Waxman bill is worse.
■Green Jobs Are a Myth, Real Job Losses are Not: For every “green job” created, others are wiped out. Job losses resulting from the Lieberman-Warner cap and trade would have surpassed 900,000 in some years. Keep in mind that this is net of any “green jobs” created.
■New Version, More Expensive: Markey-Waxman will be much more costly than the bill rejected by the U.S. Senate last year. Such an expensive tax on all Americans is bad under normal circumstances and worse during a recession.A “Carbon Constrained Future”
■The Ultimate Outsourcing: India and China have repeatedly said they would not match U.S. environmental goals in order to protect their economies. Cap and Trade will merely move manufacturing jobs to China and India.
■By 2100: By EPA calculations, the Lieberman-Warner bill would have at best resulted in a global drop in temperature of only 0.1 to 0.2 degrees Celsius by the year 2100.
■A Carbon Tax Would Be No Different: Alternative carbon taxes share the central flaw of any other carbon reduction scheme. Similar to cap and trade, a carbon tax would cause significant economic damage and would do very little to reduce global temperatures.
■An Alternative That Supports American Taxpayers: Instead of appeasing a radical environmental agenda, President Obama should give us access to all energy sources, including domestic oil production, nuclear energy, coal, and new renewable fuels. Instead of new taxes, the President should instead aim to lower gas and electricity prices. When government impediments are lifted, America’s energy entrepreneurs can develop innovative and market-driven solutions to our energy needs.
Still Not Scared or Concerned about this Massive Piece of Legislation that Our Current Government is trying to Rush into Law?

Check Out Some of these 34 Links I've Found when I was Researching This Cap-and-Trade Climate Bill:
2. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123655590609066021.html - Wall Street Journal ArticleHint: They were promised a tax cut during the Obama campaign."An economy-wide tax under the cover of saving the environment is the best political moneymaker since the income tax."
5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpNcBPLhclI – Glenn Beck’s Take on Cap & Trade Bill
6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIy6UqpF4SI - Mark Levin on Cap and Trade
10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mchkiym-Ydc – Mark Levin with Eric Cantor just after the Cap and Trade Bill Passes in the House
17. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lumPeXxSI5c – John Boehner Filibusters Cap and Trade Bill
30. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uymXCJ9Zovk - Mark Levin Interviews John Boehner
31. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrHRA09FX6M - Mark Levin Calls Out the 8 Republicans Who Voted for Cap and Trade Bill in Congress
32. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgWxfkpIbEU - Mark Levin Talks with Mike Pence about Cap and Trade on the Floor of Congress During Climate Bill Vote

If Those 34 Links Don't Help Give You More Info or Have Shown You Just How Dangerous and Damaging this Bill Will be to America, I'm NOT Sure What Will.I'll End on this Note.
This is NOT a Popular Bill among Most Americans or Congressmen in the House!
Only 8 Republican Congressmen Voted For This Bill.
The Rest Voted Against it or in Representative Flake's Case of AZ DID NOT Vote which in My Book is the Same as Voting for it.
It's Clear this Bill is Descructive and Damages America in Major Ways.
It Grows the Size and Strength of Government over Our Life.
When has that EVER been Helpful or Positive?
Please Take Some Time and Go Through these Links.
Do the Same research I did.
Then Let Me Know What You Think. Thanks!

My Thoughts on Manmade Global Warming aka Climate Change..It's a Hoax!

I Personally Choose to Believe that Manmade Global Warming aka "Climate Change" is a Hoax.
It's a Lie.
It Simply Does NOT Exist.
Al Gore, The UN and the UK have ALL Bought into this Lie.
My Opinion and Belief is that There is NO Significant Man-Made Global Warming or Climate Change at this Time, there has NOT been any in the past and there is little reason to fear any in the future.
I didn't say that the activities of man do not alter the weather and climate, because it is clear they do. What I said there is no significant man-made climate change and none should be reasonably expected to occur in the future.The science behind this current global warming, man-made climate change commotion, has failed to verify. The hypothesis that our carbon footprints produced by our use of fossil fuels is producing a significant greenhouse effect that will lead to climate calamity has failed to verify. So I repeat, there is no significant man-made global climate change.
I have studied the research papers of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and examined the science presented by Al Gore in his books, his movie and his power point. I have traced the history of the development of the concept of carbon dioxide in the exhaust from our cars, power plants and industrial plants entering the atmosphere and interacting with the primary greenhouse gas, water vapor, to magnify warming. It all collapses into a failed theory when examined with scientific care.
I am not alone in reaching this conclusion. In the past year, 34 thousand scientists, 10 thousand with PhDs, have signed a statement debunking global warming. There is solid scientific evidence that by burning fossil fuels our civilization increases the amount of carbon dioxide, CO2, in the atmosphere. However, even after 150 years of burning fossil fuels, CO2 remains a tiny trace gas. To be precise only 380 molecules out of every one million are CO2. Scientists with an anti-fossil fuel agenda developed a theory of radiative forcing to explain how this trace gas could create runaway greenhouse warming. They put that theory into general circulation computer models. Their models then projected a continuous rapid rise in global temperatures year after year. In the 1980s and 1990's the models seemed on track as temperatures climbed. But in 1998 the warming stopped. By 2002 a rapid cooling had begun. That cooling continues today. The computer proof has failed. It has become clear the warming in the 80s and 90s was at the peak of a solar cycle and now that the sun has gone very quiet, cooling has gripped the planet. Yet the models continue to predict warming that is not happening. There is no significant warming from CO2.
I am painfully aware that global warming has become a political issue.
I deeply regret that.
I want to make very clear my conclusion is in no way politically based.

In the 1970's when there was a similar flurry of excitement about a coming Ice Age. Thankfully our government and political parties didn't get involved so when the science got things straightened out, the frenzy faded away. Unfortunately, this time people with the anti fossil fuel agenda had jumped on the global warming bandwagon and just won't let go. They have calmed the rhetoric to climate change, but they are still all wrapped up in cap and trade to tax our use of fossil fuels. This will do great harm to our economy but do nothing of consequence to protect the environment.Reject the extremist agendas and concentrate on your wonderful work protecting our natural resources and making natural experiences available to us citizens of today and generations to follow.I'd like to see the Special Tax-exempt Status Granted to Environmental Groups Elimated, since they're NOT NonPartisan Charitable Foundations.Eliminate Special Statutory Authority Granting Environmental Groups Standing to Bring Lawsuits on behalf of the Public, since their Main Purpose is to Pursue the Statist's agenda through Litigation.Fight ALL Efforts to use Environmental Regulations to set Governmental Industrial Policies and Diminish the Nation's Standard of Living, such as "Cap-and-Trade" to Regulate "Man-Made Climate Change."But Don't Just Take My Word on this.
Check Out The Link Below at John Coleman's Link. See What John Coleman Thinks, Writes and Says about Manmade Gobal Warming aka "Climate Change".
http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner - A Great Source About Global Warming
You've Got to Go to This Link and Read What John Coleman Writes about Al Gore and Global Warminghttp://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/38609397.html
John Coleman's Remarks Before The International Conference on Climate Change in 2009http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/41029077.html
John Coleman's Remarks Before The International Conference on Climate Change in 2008http://media.kusi.com/documents/REMARKS+OF+JOHN+COLEMAN+FINAL6c.pdfJohn Coleman's Open Letter to Environmentalistshttp://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/12661711.html

But I Don't Only Listen to or Believe ONLY What John Coleman Thinks, Writes or Says. John Coleman is a Great Source of Reference though. John Coleman was the Founder of the Weather Channel.
There are Many Scientists Who Agree With John Coleman and Me too!
Here are TWO Great Links that Clearly Show Massive Opposition to Al Gore's Claims to Manmade Global Warming aka "Climate Change"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfHW7KR33IQ – John Coleman Suing Al Gore with 30,000 Scientists (9,000 Phds) For Global Warming Fraud
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/29/weather-channel-founder-blasts-gore-global-warming-campaign/

Here are Some Rasmussent Polls Showing What Americans Generally Think about Manmade Global Warming aka "Climate Change"
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/56_don_t_want_to_pay_more_to_fight_global_warminghttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/50_favor_building_more_nuke_plants_in_u_shttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/only_34_now_blame_humans_for_global_warminghttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/53_say_u_s_should_build_more_nuclear_power_plantshttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/60_stress_need_for_new_sources_of_energy_32_favor_conservationhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/issues2/articles/54_say_media_hype_global_warming_dangershttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/october_2008/voters_see_conflict_between_growth_and_the_environmenthttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/an_inconvenient_perception_voters_say_gore_plan_unrealistic_costlyhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/issues2/articles/47_say_global_warming_very_serious_problemhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/general_current_events/62_say_develop_alternative_sources_of_energy_12_favor_conservationHere'shttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/50_favor_building_more_nuke_plants_in_u_shttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/only_34_now_blame_humans_for_global_warminghttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/53_say_u_s_should_build_more_nuclear_power_plantshttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/60_stress_need_for_new_sources_of_energy_32_favor_conservationhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/issues2/articles/54_say_media_hype_global_warming_dangershttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/october_2008/voters_see_conflict_between_growth_and_the_environmenthttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/an_inconvenient_perception_voters_say_gore_plan_unrealistic_costlyhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/issues2/articles/47_say_global_warming_very_serious_problemhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/general_current_events/62_say_develop_alternative_sources_of_energy_12_favor_conservationHere's

Some More Great Links of Related Articles about Global Warming aka "Climate Change"http://www.ft.com/cms/s/c2896b88-77bd-11de-9713-00144feabdc0,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=

http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=158448

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8150415.stm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WJynIeWkf4

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-climate-bill-carbon-trading-scam-of-the-century.html

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=114

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/04/green-lobby-guides-democrats-on-climate-bill/

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change http://www.ipcc.ch/

The Al Gore movie, “An Inconvenient Truth http://www.climatecrisis.net/

An online article about the word “deniers” used to describe Global Warming skeptics http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/1782/

United Nations IPCC Chapter 9, the key chapter on CO2 Forcing http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter9.pdf

Natural Resources Defense Council Global Warming report http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/fcons.asp

Michael Mann and the Hockey Stick Chart http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Mann_(scientist)

Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick’s Paper refuting the Hockey Stick Chart http://www.climateaudit.org/pdf/mcintyre.grl.2005.pdf

Stephen McIntyre’s website http://www.climateaudit.org/

I Hope this Blog Helps to Give You More Information about Manmade Global Warming aka "Climate Change". That is My Intent. I Want More People to be Informed and Educated about this Issue and NOT just Accept Manmade Global Warming aka "Climate Change" as Fact just because it is Widely Accpeted by Al Gore, The UN, UK and The Mainstream Media. Haven't We Learned Enough Over The Years NOT to Trust/Believe Anything and Everything We Read but to do Our Own Research to Determine What the True Facts Really are.