Conservatives Know Mitt Romney. That's His Problem!

Conservatives know everything about Mitt Romney.  We know all of his press releases and talking points.  We know of his resume highlights about Bain Capital and “saving the Olympics”.  We know Mitt Romney well from the last time he ran back in 2008 when he actually had most of our support over John McCain.  We’re told to look at Mitt Romney as a business man from the private sector.  We’re told that he has the best “executive experience” because he was governor of Massachusetts.  We’re told he’s a nice guy with a great family.  We’re told that Mitt Romney is a Conservative and Romney proves it by spending millions of dollars from fundraising and his Super PACs on negative attack ads focusing on his Republican rivals.  Especially if those candidates are considered conservative or tea party or anything like that. 

On paper, Mitt Romney looks like he has everything and the media plays up his looks like a president, has lots of money, great organization and name recognition from 2008 run but what Mitt Romney is lacking is Conservative principles.  Mitt Romney is not winning over his Conservative base that he desperately needs to beat Obama in the general election to become President.  Just as McCain had Amnesty through immigration reform that he never admitted to, Romney has forced an individual mandate of health insurance on his citizens as governor of Massachusetts that he still refuses to admit was wrong or a mistake.

Here’s my problem with Mitt Romney.  Mitt Romney is not a Conservative.  When Conservatives have looked into Romney’s “executive experience” as governor of Massachusetts, Conservatives find Romneycare.  The Obamacarebefore Obamacare.  As Conservatives, We must Naturally reject and object to Romneycare and the individual mandate that Romney supported, fought for and signed into law with a big smile and clapping standing right next to Senator Ted Kennedy.  Here is actual video from that bill signing with Liberal Senator Ted Kennedy.  Romneycare is not a State’s Right Issue or a 10^th Amendment Issue.  An individual mandate is an individual mandate.  For Romney to stillnot admit that Romneycare was a mistake or wrong just makes Conservatives even angrier.  Romney upsets Conservatives further by defending it and trying to make it out to be something we know it is not.  Romneycare is a disaster.  Romneycare is as big government as big government gets.  The National Conservative Tea Party Movement was created, in large part, to Obama fighting as long and as hard as he did to get Obamacare finally passed against the wishes of the American people and with no support from Republicans.  Romneycare takes over 1/6^th of Massachusetts’ economy forcing every citizen to purchase health care insurance or pay a fine whether they want to or not.   Whether they can afford health care insurance or not.  Romneycare is a nightmare destroying health care in Massachusetts.  The whole premise of why Mitt Romney felt that he needed to enforce Romneycare on the people of Massachusetts is ridiculous.  Romney says he needed to pass Romneycare to cut down on the “free riders” that were taking advantage of the existing system.  Mitt Romney actually suggested three times in 2009 that Obama imitate Romneycare.  Mitt Romney's urging Obama to embrace the individual mandate is well documented by Erick Erickson of Redstate and well known among Conservatives.  Mitt Romney actually advocated for Obamacare and then lied about it as reported by Jon Chait of New York Magazine and posted on RealClearPolitics.  Virginia Attorney General, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli fears Romney nomination would neutralize health law as issue.  I know I am not alone in this insecurity about Romney vs Obama on health law issue. 

Conservatives know there is a solution to this problem already.  It is called Medicaid and a portion of our hard earned tax dollars goes to funding it every paycheck.  Every state has Medicaid and it’s designated purpose is to insure the poor and needy.  Every governor in every state in America faces these same kind of financial hardships in health care in their respective states.  Mitt Romney is the only governor to force an individual mandate in health care on the people he was elected to represent.  If You ever listen to or get a chance to actually hear Mitt Romney talk about what he did as governor in respect to Romneycare, you'd hear with your own ears and see with your own eyes exactly how proud and excited he gets when the subject does come up.  IF Mitt Romney is so proud and so confident about his role in passing Romneycare, Where are all of his campaign ads where he is describing how good and positive Romneycare is for Massachusetts and America?  They don’t exist.  They are not coming either. 

The pure and simple truth is that Romneycare is a huge government intrusion into the Massachusetts health care system.  That is neither Conservative or fiscally responsible.  Did Mitt Romney know and understand exactly what he was doing when he signed Romneycare into law as governor of Massachusetts?  Was Romney forced into it or bullied into signing Romneycare by the over 85% Democrat legislature he faced in Massachusetts?  The answers to these questions are hard for Republicans and especially Conservatives to stomach.  Mitt Romney is in his 60’s now while running for President.  He was in his 50’s, married with grown children and over 25 years of private sector experience when he passed Romneycare into law.  I’m 34 going on 35.  I’m also married with two great kids and over twenty years of experience in the private sector.  If I know at 35 it would not be Conservative or in line with the Republican Party Principles to sign a massive individual mandate on health insurance as governor representing your party as head of your party of your state, Romney was older, wiser and further set in his ways when he fought for, championed and passed Romneycare.  Conservatives are supposed to ignore that fact and act like that is not significant or a monumental decision that ultimately defines what kind of governor he actually is.  Not what he says or pretends to be on the campaign trail.  Politicians twist themselves into pretzels trying to be all things to all people.  They do this in hopes for gaining as many votes possible for them to win the office they are running for.  Mitt Romney is this kind of politician.  Not all politicians are like this but Mitt Romney certainly does fall just perfectly into this category of politicians running for office.   Many analysts have called campaign 'plastic and dishonest'.  Conservatives have a great quality for spotting these kinds of fakes or phonies.  Conservatives are not fooled because they know the issues and stand by their principles.  They study and evaluate every candidate on the issues and principles.  I know Conservatives do this research of the candidates because I am such a Conservative.  I vet all of the candidates running because I want to know which one is best and most qualified to be in office representing me and my Conservative Principles.  I’m a Conservative that is not necessarily loyal to a particular candidate or party running for office.  I look for the best overall candidate who best represents my Conservative Principles that I can trust to follow through once elected into office.  The snag for many voters is they think certain candidates are best because of the way they look or talk or carry themselves in public.  While those are important, that is all style over substance.  Conservatives don’t believe the hype or settle for anything less than candidates championing their Conservative Principles.  Nothing less will do for us.  The other snag for some people are those who think a candidate who is well known and well liked by the Republican Party Establishment should be the candidate that all Republicans should line up behind and get on board with.  Again, Conservatives don’t necessarily go with the flow or follow the pack.  They tend to be Independent Free Thinkers who know and understand exactly what they want and expect out of their candidates in every election no matter what election it is.  We don’t base our opinions off what others do or think.  We make up our own minds based on our principles.  That’s it.   

Romneycare is not the only problem that Conservatives have seen in Mitt Romney’s extensive resume in public office.  Romney is also on record of supporting Manmade Global Warming even after climategate, Ethanol Subsidies, classwarfare rhetoric and mandatory minimum wage increases.  Romney also has no problem ruthlessly attacking his Conservative rivals calling Newt Gingrich “mentally unstable” and Rick Santorum an “Economic Lightweight”.  Then Mitt Romney is very careful when he marks his words when speaking about Obama.  This only helps remind Conservatives how Senator John McCain choose to run his Presidential campaign back in 2008.  In 2008, McCain never batted an eye when he criticized his GOP competitors in the primary leading up to his nomination but would chastise and dismiss any level of negative attacks on Barack Obama.  McCain rejected those kinds of comments even calling Obama “a good man who would make a good president”.  His words.  They still suck and are dead wrong.  So here is Mitt Romney who apparently learned right out of John McCain’s playbook to have no mercy on fellow Republicans but keep the gloves on to Obama.  Great strategy except it didn’t work out too well for John McCain in 2008 and it won’t work out well for Mitt Romney either.  You would think that the same Republicans that voted to nominate Senator John McCain in 2008 would have learned their lesson by now four years later after an Obama Presidency that has increased our National Debt, total size of government and no end in sight for an out of control government hell bent on spending the next generation’s future on today’s whims.

If you are a Mitt Romney supporter reading this, please understand that we  know the good, the bad and the ugly about Mitt Romney.  We reject him and everything he stands for.  Romney does not stand on our Conservative principles.  We’re not dumb or ignorant when it comes to who and what Mitt Romney really is.  We know.  Maybe you need to re-evaluate the Mitt Romney you think you know and trust.  We don’t trust Romney because we know his history and reject his “executive experience” as governor of Massachusetts.  Romney’s over twenty five years in the private sector experience at Bain Capital and his saving the Olympics didn’t help or serve his well as governor.  Why should Conservatives think Mitt Romney has finally learned how to be a Principled Conservative now if elected president?   Does that sound logical at this point in Romney’s career?  Not to mention that he has every Establishment Republican “Insider” endorsing him.  What do they like and see about Mitt Romney?  Could it be Romney’s weakness to cave in and give in to big government? 

Still think Romney will repeal Obamacare if elected president?  Think again.  Please consider this.  Mitt Romney stands by Romneycare.  Romney defends Romneycare just as McCain still refuses to call immigration reform “Amnesty”.  Romney Advisor Norm Coleman predicts GOP President won’t repeal Obamacare.  When pressed and pinned down by anyone about his exact plans to repeal Obamacare, No further details are given beyond check out what is posted on his webpage.  Mitt Romney offers no exact plan to repeal Obamacare on his webpage.  Mitt Romney talks a big game about repealing Obamacare on the campaign trail these days. But in the wake of the law's passage, he had a more modest goal: "repealthe bad and keep the good."  Then you have to cringe and shutter when Conservative Tea Party Republicans like BobMcDonnell, Niki Haley, Pam Bondi and Ann Coulter not only defending Romneycare as conservative but actually defending it as a good free market solution.  That goes too far and is unacceptable.  Mitt Romney may have a few Conservative Tea Party Republican candidates endorsing him and defending his individual mandate but that is to their peril.  Not ours.  Again, Conservatives are individual free thinkers who judge candidates based on their principles.  Not loyal to any candidate or party.  These four people I listed above are the exception.  Not the rule.  They may be ok with shelving their Conservative principles for whatever personal reasons they have in their life.  That does not make them right or the standard we should follow. 

Bottomline.  I will vote for Mitt Romney in the general election if he wins the GOP’s nomination.  I did vote for Senator John McCain back in 2008.  That doesn’t mean that other like-minded Conservatives will do the same.  Many may decided to stay home or write-in a candidate they really like just to spite Mitt Romney and the Republican Party.  I don’t agree with those two options but everyone is different and not everyone agrees with what is best for this country.  I hope and pray that Conservatives will unite and vote for whoever the Republican Nominee is at the end of this primary.  Even if that nominee is Mitt Romney.  I’ll be open and honest by saying I will not vote for Ron Paul under any circumstance.  I don’t care what he says or does.  We all have our standards and lines we won’t cross.  I won’t support or vote for Ron Paul.  I have many valid quality reasons for that.  Ron Paul is my only exception.  Other Conservatives may have that similar feelings about Mitt Romney.  I do not agree but not all Conservatives agree on everything all of the time.  As I stated earlier, Conservatives are independent free thinkers who don’t go with the flow or follow the pack.  I know and understand that.  Will Mitt Romney ever get that?  Will his supporters ever understand it?  I doubt it.  That is their problem. 

I actually still like Mitt Romney and would absolutely vote for him if he is the Republican nominee. That being said, I don’t think America will choose Mitt Romney in 2012 just like they didn’t choose him in 2008. Mitt Romney lost to John McCain in 2008 and I predict he will lose again to Rick Santorum or Newt Gingrich. Nothing against Mitt but America Needs a Solid, Articulate, Passionate and Battle-Hardened Champion to Lead and Represent them as President going forward. As Good as Mitt Romney may have been or still is, Romney’s Best still falls short again in 2012. Sorry Mitt.

Sincerely, Conservative Voters across America

Three Cheers For Rick Santorum. None for Mitt Romney.

Rick Santorum finally deserves some credit for being a strong candidate that is clearly electable.  Rick Santorum won Oklahoma, Tennessee, North Dakota and almost won in Ohio which many analysts and so called "experts" were calling Ohio "the crown jewel" of Super Tuesday.  Combine that effort with the hat trick of three wins in one day with Colorado, Minnessota and Missouri.  Rick Santorum has proved with little doubt that his "Made In america" message along with his "Economic Freedom Agenda" vision for America is reasonating with "very conservative" and "tea party" voters.  I do think Rick Santorum will continue to win voters over in the upcoming primary states.  Rick Santorum is doing so well at this point in the primary is truly surprising and amazing because Santorum was being hammered with negative attack ads from the Romney campaign and Romney's CPACs in key counties in key states like Michigan and Ohio.  Again that only proves that more voters know and are well informed about what Mitt Romney is selling and are not buying in.  It should also be pointed out that Rick Santorum was outspent by at least 3 to 1 in every state they've done battle in.  Just as Romney and his surrogates use the same kind of negative attack ads against Newt Gingrich in New Hampshire and Florida after Gingrich's huge win in South Carolina. 

Many voting Americans who follow politics and care what is happening in this country and what our government is doing are placing their hope, trust, respect, admiration and vote into Rick Santorum.  These same concerned citizens who follow politics and turn out to vote in every election throughout their entire life are looking to Rick Santorum to rescue this primary from an easy win for Mitt Romney.  They are Conservative Tea Party Patriots who confidently and proudly describe themselves as very conservative when asked by anyone.  They show up at tea party rallies, protests and organised events with conservative guest speakers like Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, Mark Levin, Andrew Breitbart, Larry Schweikart, Jim Hoft, Bill Hennessy and Alfonzo Rachel just to name a few. 

Why are these Conservative Tea Party Patriots siding with Rick Santorum over the next-in-line establishment candidate, Mitt Romney?  What is Rick's Appeal?  Rick Sanoturm has fought for conservative issues.  Santorum handles the left with a Clear Consistent Conservative messgage.  For Rick Santorum voters,it's character that counts.  Conservative leaders like Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh have praised Rick Santorum as the most conservative candidate left.   Rush has even said that Rick Santorum offers a clear contrast to Obama."  There has also been a huge boost in support for Ricksantorum through Great articles on Conservative web pages like Redstate with titles like "Rick Santorum: Yes, he is a true conservative", "Femi-regulars for Rick Santorum", the weeklystandard's Jeffery H. Anderson and Wickersham wrote "Was Santorum a Senate Spendthrift", Which was followed up nicely by popular conservative blogger TheRightScoop's wrote "Dear Santorum Bashers. Read this and weep.", NationalJournal's "Candidate Guide: Where Does Rick Santorum Stand?" and popular conservative blogger Dan Riehl of Riehl World View has written a few positive pieces supporting Santorum when he wrote "Conservatives Shouldn't Abandon Rick Santorum", "It's Rick Santorum's Time", and my personal favorite, "Dear Spineless Cowards: STFU About Santorum's Religion-based Comments".

It could also be Santorum's Winning Work Ethic, Rick Santorum's Iowa video: 'With seven kids...in two mini-vans' helped to prove just that.  Rick Santorum has the best chance of winning over Reagan democrats especially in battleground swing states that will be crucial in the general election against Obama.  Star Parker Wrote "America's heartland supports Santorum".  Rick Santorum is winning more support from Republican women.  Many believe that Santorum is a tough, scrappy and confident guy who would take the fight directly to Obama in the general election.  The Daily Caller's Matt Lewis came up with 5 Reasons Obama Should 'Fear the Vest'.  Newsobserver.com  made their case Why it should be Obama vs. Santorum.  TwinCities.com wrote "Joe Soucheray: Santorum, the guy in the sweater vest, is the one Obama fears "  These kinds of articles clearly cast a positive light on and about Rick Santorum vs Obama in the general election.  So much so that even Paul Scicchitano of Newsmax wrote a column about it entitled "Rasmussen: Santorum Surge Has 'Substance'"

The Wall Street Journal wrote about Rick Santorum's Spirited Reception at CPAC.  Al DiGuido of HumanEvents wrote about Rick Santorum's Surge Online, Winning Friends on Facebook and Followers on Twitter.  That is very important and vital edge to have with the new media among.  Every candidate wants that edge but rarely gains it with some exceptions like Sarah Palin, Herman Cain and Allen West.  If that doesn't matter to you or impress you, Rick Santorum does have a long endorsement list of more well known famous people posted on his website showing who have publicly endorsed him.  It is impressive.  Conservative people like Mark Levin, Glenn Beck, Michelle Malkin, David Limbaugh, Gary Bauer, James Dobson and Joseph Farah just to name a few. 

Whether he's winning voters over through his speeches, what he says at the debates or is quoted in the media while on the campaign trail, gaining fans online or important friends in high places, I find myself in agreement with Rebecca Kaplan of NationalJournal when she wrote "Santorum Rhetoric Gets Sharper".  Matt Lewis of The Daily Caller does a good job of reminding his reading audience that Republicans usually win on social issues (and why this helps Rick Santorum).  
I personally think most people began noticing and liking Rick Santorum during the Florida debate when he stood out as a positive campaigner who just wanted to focus on the issues and not personal politics.  That only helped him when he took the fight to Mitt Romney in the debate over Romney's support for Romneycare and the individual mandate he imposed as governor of Massechussetts.  I think that was a real eye opener and refreshing moment that conservatives have been waiting for a candidate to do.  Rick Santorum finally did it and did a great job too.  That only helped open the floodgates in the minds of conservatives that somone was capable and willing to take on Mitt Romney. 

Once Rick Santorum opened that door, he ran right through it.  Conservative bloggers began to take notice in support of Rick Santorum's effort to expose Mitt Romney's Romneycare and individual mandate in Massechussetts.  Mitt Romney still refuses to admit that Romneycare or the individual mandate he signed into law as governor of Massechussetts was wrong and not a good idea.  Mitt Romney defends it and makes excuses for it.  Too many conservatives already know it is.  Santorum attacks Romney’s record on heathcare, individual mandate saying "Romneycare 'In some respects' worse than Obamacare" and On Healthcare, Obamacare and Romneycare will hurt Ohio families.  Then Santorum blasts Romney for 2009 Opt-Ed on Individual Mandate.  That is a winning message to use against Mitt Romney that should continue to pick up steam and generate momentum in Santorum's direction the further this primary election goes on.    Especially since Rick Santorum has been proven time and time again to  have always been against individual mandates as far back as 1994.  Rick Santorum has always wanted and fought for free market solutions for health care related issues.  A clear distinction between himself and Mitt Romney's approach to health care. 

Obamacare, Cap-and-Trade, Stimulus and TARP bills are arguably the top hot button issues that help to create the massive Conservative Tea Party Movement in America.  Romneycare goes against the grain of the Conservative Tea Party Movement because it does include an individual mandate, it is a big government intrusion into the free market system in Massechussetts and by no means conservative.  Erick Erickson of Redstate has called Mitt Romney out at least twice about Mitt Romney Urges to Embrace Individual Mandate and again with his follow up Further Proof Romney Supported a National Individual Mandate in 2009.

I know and completely understand that Mitt Romney would love for his record of Romneycare to be forgotten about and never talked about ever again.  That can't happen, won't happen and shouldn't happen.  The whole idea of the Conservative Tea Party movement and conservative's new media is to hold these politicians accountable for their unnessessary intrussions into our lives.  Whether that be in our homes, workplace, place of worship or health care decisions.  Mitt Romney wants Romneycare to go away and never be discussed again much like John McCain wanted his multiple attempts to pass amnesty through immigration reform to go away from him back in 2008.  It never did and haunted him throughout the primary and into the general election as well.  The same will be true for Mitt Romney with his Romneycare.  It was wrong, a bad bill and should've never been signed into law by him as a republican governor.  The excuses Romney continues to offer up don't cut the mustard either.  Romney was the only governor who signed this kind of individual mandate into law.  Every governor in America faces the same economic issues that Massechussetts was facing and I have news for Romney and his diehard supporters, Massechussetts is not the only liberal blue state with over 85% Democratic legislature.  There's plenty of state governments facing similar challenges that Mitt Romney faced while governor of Massechussetts.  The difference is they found other ways to deal with the issue.  Sadly, Mitt Romney did not. 

Why should Mitt Romney's weakness and failure to make free market based solutions in Massechussett  force conservatives who know better have to twist ourselves into pretzels defending Romney's poor decision.  We shouldn't.  We must not. 

Rick Santorum is standing up against this.  Conservatives should be supporting him in this effort.  I can't think of a better way of doing this than by voting for Santorum in your state's primary.  When Rick Santorum goes on to win this nomination, don't you want to be on the right side of history.  I do.  I am.  I am doing all I can to help support Rick Santorum.  I challenge you and everyone you know or don't know to do the same. 

Here are some Great Links to Articles and Videos on and about Romneycare, Obamacare and the other problems I have with Mitt Romney winning the GOP Nomination.  Please take the time to go through them and see the research I have about this. 

Romney's "Collaborator and Friend", Ted Kennedy (One of the "Parents" of Romneycare) at the Romney-Kennedy Health Care Bill Signing

Mitt Romney defends the individual mandate

2009 Romney glad to hear Obama copying RomneyCare

How Romney Advocated Obamacare and Lied About It

Mitt Romney Suggested Three Times In 2009 That Obama Imitate Romneycare

More videos of Romney pushing national individual mandate

Scoring Last Week's RomneyCare Debate
Santorum pointed out crucial similarities that Romney's own plan has with Obama's deeply unpopular health law.

The Failure of RomneyCare

The former Massachusetts governor enacted something very similar to the Obama health plan. It isn't working well.

Is Obamacare just Romneycare 2.0?

Analyst says the programs are 'virtually identical'

Confirmed Romneycare = Obamacare

A Short Must See Video Romneycare Vs. Obamacare

Romneycare and Obamacare:  can You Tell the Difference?

Mark Levin’s rebuttal of Ann Coulter’s “Three Cheers for RomneyCare” article

Romneycare Becomes Obamacare, Then Coultercare

Coulter Care

Romney Explains Why He Can't Beat Obama

Can Romney Lead the Fight against ObamaCare?

The Truth About RomneyCare

Despite the candidate's denials, his program had numerous price controls.

Romney and the Mandate

Did Romney Support a Federal Mandate During the Obamacare Debate?

Romneycare Failure, Public Disappointment Bode Ill for Obamacare

It begins – Jay Carney says ObamaCare based on RomneyCare

Romney on Romneycare: First Subsidize, Then Mandate

Romney Plan for Replacing ObamaCare Light on Details

New reason to doubt Romney would repeal Obamacare

Romney adviser Norm Coleman predicts GOP president won't repeal health law

VIDEO: Mitt Heaps Praise on Romneycare "Parent" Ted Kennedy

Why A President Romney Would Find It Hard To Repeal ‘Obamacare’

Mark Levin Makes Really Good Solid Points about Mitt Romney also.   These Concerns are Not New but Span as far back as 2008.  Please take some time to hear out some of Mark Levin's Concerns.  Thanks.

Mark Levin On Mitt Romney and the EPA - Jan 5th 2011

Mark Levin Who Is Mitt Romney? - Jan 12th 2011

Mark Levin goes nuclear over Romney's inability to explain conservatism - Feb 2 2012

Mark Levin Slams the Romney Campaign Over Smears and Falsehoods! - Feb 7th 2012

Mark Levin's extensive exposition of Ron Paul and Mitt Romney alliance  - Feb 26th 2012

This is a critical time in our history and the wrong person leading our party could end up ruining our party forever.  A Mitt Romney for President can do as much harm or worse to the Republican Party and America as a Democrat.  It would just be at a slower pace.  Weak Republican leadership in the White House and Congress gets us nowhere but it does annoy us and frustrate us even more.  Let's save ourselves the frustration and anger now by supporting the Most Consistant Clear Contrast to Obama and Vote to Elect Rick Santorum for President. 

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/02/12/1845605/why-it-should-be-obama-vs-santorum.html#storylink=cpy

ObamaCare is a Bad Bill and Wrong for America

ObamaCare is a Bad Bill and Wrong for America http://t.co/r3Plb58
This message was sent using the Picture and Video Messaging service from Verizon Wireless!
To learn how you can snap pictures and capture videos with your wireless phone visit www.verizonwireless.com/picture.
Note: To play video messages sent to email, QuickTime� 6.5 or higher is required.

ObamaCare Is A BAD Bill And Wrong For America

I'm taking the time to write this note on Obamacare due to the fact that some self-described Liberals, Independents and Moderates I know who still believe that Obamacare "Isn't ALL Bad" and "Can be Fixed".  No it can't.  I will prove without a shadow of a doubt that a bad bill is a bad bill. It needs to be defunded, repealed and replaced with free market solutions instead of this disaster called Obamacare.

UPDATED INFORMATION REGARDING OBAMACARE:

Fri Aug 12, 2011 6:26pm  - Appeals Court Rules AgainstObama Healthcare Mandate
The U.S. Appeals Court for the 11th Circuit, based in Atlanta, ruled 2 to 1 that Congress exceeded its authority by requiring Americans to buy coverage, but it unanimously reversed a lower court decision that threw out the entire law.

August 12, 2011 - U.S. Appeals Court Declares"Individual Mandate" Unconstitutional
The 11th Circuit U.s. Court of Appeals in Atlanta, Georgia has declared the "individual mandate" provision of President Obama's health care bill unconstitutional, calling it an "unprecedented exercise of congressional power," Reuters reports.

The section of the bill in question made it illegal for an individual not to have health insurance, and is one of the most contested parts of the law passed in March 2010. The attorneys-general of 26 states filed suit in the 11th Circuit to have the law overturned.

Mark Levin's Landmark Files First Brief in
Florida Obamacare Case.
May 11, 2011
One of the law firms representing a lead party in the Florida litigation launched by 26 states challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare invited Mark Levin's Landmark Legal Foundation to file an amicus curiae ("Friend of the Court") brief in support of the federal district court's decision that Obamacare was unconstitutional. Landmark was asked to address the Commerce Clause and tax issues relating to the legislation.
Landmark's amicus brief is here: /uploads/Brief_Filed.pdf  - It is 40 Pages long.

Let's Not Ever Forget How ObamaCare was Passed with cheers and applause of Liberal Democrats and ONLY ONE Republican Who Voted for it. Hardly BiPartisan. Very UnPopular! In a victory for President Barack Obama, the Democratic-controlled House narrowly passed landmark health care legislation Saturday night. The final vote was 220-215 with only one Republican voting with the Democrats.

There is Hope and a Way to Defund it and Mark Levin Sees DeFunding ObamaCare like this: http://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-levin/how-to-defund-obamacare/449971410945


How to defund Obamacare. You read it here first.
Set forth in this article:
http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1011213

ObamaCare's Incentive to Drop Insurance.

Alert readers will remember the White House summer of 2009 invitation to all Americans to send in their horror stories describing health insurance industry abuses. Although the complaints were many, the vast majority were about pre-existing condition limitations. Then, on the eve of the ObamaCare vote, every member of Congress who appeared on television to defend the legislation was able to cite by name an individual or family in his or her state or Congressional district with a heart wrenching story.

Out of 310 million Americans, only 8,000 people have pre-existing condition limitations as the principal reason for spending almost $1 trillion, creating more than 150 regulatory agencies and causing perhaps 150 million or more people to change the coverage they now have.

Gone was any interest in “universal coverage” or “insuring the uninsured” or “helping poor people get health care.” The case for change was focused almost exclusively on protecting the middle class from miserly insurance companies.

If Obamacare was so good and so constitutional.....Why are 1,000 businesses, groups and organizations seeking waivers from it?

03/06/11 03:38 PM ET  - By Jason Millman
The Obama administrations has now issued 1,000 "get out of ObamaCare free cards" the 1,000 also includes four state governments!
Number of healthcare reform law waivers climbs above 1,000

But Let's Forget about Who is Exempt and Who gets Waivers to Focus and Concentrate on the Elderly.
The Elderly Must Really Love this ObamaCare Idea. Right?
Not the Elderly Who Dropped AARP for Supporting ObamaCare.

The Some 60,000 Elderly People Quit AARP after finding out AARP was Endorsing ObamaCare.

I Wonder Why that is? How can that be?

The News just gets Worse for the Elderly with this News:

Obamacare spurs AARP to raise premiums

AAPS files Amended Complaint on 8/23/2010 asking court to vacate HHS regulations requiring non-Medicare providers to enroll with Medicare, to appear in PECOS, or to obtain a National Provider Identifier (“NPI”)
READ COMPLAINT
http://www.aapsonline.org/hhslawsuit/

Government Budgets to Hire 1,054 Physicians to Implement Initial Phase of Obamacareby Michelle Malkin on Tuesday, February 15, 2011 at 8:46pm
http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=1035391191&start=120#!/note.php?note_id=499587705676&id=269123710083

Obama and the Dems had to Protect Medicare through all of this ObamaCare Process Right?

I'm afraid Not.

They Thought it'd be a Better Idea to cut $500 Billion Dollars out of Medicare.

The Congressional majority wants to pay for its $1 trillion to $1.6 trillion health bills with new taxes and a $500 billion cut to Medicare. This cut will come just as baby boomers turn 65 and increase Medicare enrollment by 30%. Less money and more patients will necessitate rationing. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that only 1% of Medicare cuts will come from eliminating fraud, waste and abuse.

The assault against seniors began with the stimulus package in February. Slipped into the bill was substantial funding for comparative effectiveness research, which is generally code for limiting care based on the patient’s age.

But what about Medicare Advantage?
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/09/17/massive-medicare-advantage-cuts/

Less Choices, Higher Premiums. Big Insurance, Big Medicine.

Where are the Jobs? Obamacare Resulting in Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs Being Lost.

CBO Director: ObamaCare will worsen the Economy. Even CBO Is Skeptical of Obamacare.

ObamaCare’s Report Card: It's Worse Than We Thought.

The Massive Costs on States’ Shoulders. Obamacare Mandates Send State Costs Skyrocketing.

ObamaCare’s False Promises. Obamacare Subsidies Are Not a Free Lunch.

Small Businesses Suffer under ObamaCare. Health Benefits Appear On Rise.

Top 10 Failures of ObamaCare After 6 Months Obama today is proudly touting the success of the biggest disaster of his presidency: ObamaCare

ObamaCare’s Day in Court. Obamacare’s Destiny: The Supreme Court. ObamaCare is NOT Constitutional!

Taxpayers Forced to Pay the Price. The cost of 'free' medical care.

Mandates Force Hospitals to Cut Jobs. Memorial Hospital Cites Obamacare on Hospital Layoffs.

Geographic Variation in the Quality of Prescribing Another O-care idea to defund!
Voters say, “NO!” to ObamaCare. Arizona, Oklahoma Voters Reject ObamaCare Insurance Requirement.

Democrats Defeated by their Own Ideas. How Health Care Mattered in the Midterm Elections.

Another doctor speaking out against the rationing of health care. This is chilling.

Thanks to Judge Roger Vinson, of the Northern District of Florida, in Pensacola, ruled that it's unconstitutional to require people to purchase health insurance on Jan 21st 2011, He FINALLY Forced Obama to have to APPEAL His Ruling on ObamaCare!
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Washington-Watch/Reform/25258

Posted March 3rd, 2011 at 3:22pm
Judge Vinson Clarifies His Ruling and makes the Obama Defense Team Speed up their Case in the Process. Judge Vinson to Obama: Speed up the Appeal or Stop Implementing Obamacare
The Obama administration got a well-deserved rebuke today from Judge Roger Vinson in the Florida lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare (aka the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act). Judge Vinson issued a new order in response to a bizarre and obtuse “motion to clarify” that the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed on February 17.
Vinson’s original order on January 31 could not have been clearer: He declared the entire law unconstitutional and specifically said that, because he presumed that officials of the executive branch would adhere to the law as declared by a court, his declaratory judgment striking the law down was the functional equivalent of an injunction. Judge Vinson wrote then that he presumed that the executive branch would follow his order, which any lawyer (including a lawyer President) would know requires them to cease implementing Obamacare with respect to the 26 states that are plaintiffs and the National Federation of Independent Business. That turned out to be a faulty presumption, indeed.
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/03/03/judge-vinson-to-obama-speed-up-the-appeal-or-stop-implementing-obamacare/

Here are All of the Links I Could Find Showing Jude Vinson's Ruling Against Obamacare:
 
1. http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/01/senates-47-gop-members-agree-to-back-health-care-repeal-bill--/1

2. http://freedomtorch.com/forums/topic/4063/breaking-fed-judge-rules-entir

3. http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=1035391191&start=480#!/video/video.php?v=191422777554176&comments

4. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703439504576116361022463224.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

5. http://weaselzippers.us/2011/01/31/breaking-federal-judge-in-florida-rules-obamacare-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional/

6. http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/31/us-usa-healthcare-ruling-idUSTRE70U6RY20110131?feedType=RSS&feedName=healthNews

7. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/48517.html#ixzz1CeEZzD00

I Was able to find SEVEN Links to Credible News Media ALL Reporting on Judge Vinson's Ruling.

Then January 31, 2011
47 GOP Senators agree to back health care repeal
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/01/senates-47-gop-members-agree-to-back-health-care-repeal-bill--/1

01/31/11 04:20 PM ET - By Michael O'Brien
ALL 47 Senators to be United in their Resolve to Repeal Obamacare!
Senate GOP unanimous in support for repealing healthcare reform
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/141309-senate-gop-now-unanimous-in-support-for-repealing-health-reform

Here's a List of the 47 Patriots Who Love Freedom and Liberty and the 51 Senators Who'd be Happier living under Tyranny. See where Your Senator's Loyalty is!
http://www.redstate.com/dan_perrin/2010/03/25/the-roll-call-vote-in-the-senate-on-the-repeal-of-obamacare/

January 31, 2011 47
GOP Senators Agree to back Health Care Repeal
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2011/01/senates-47-gop-members-agree-to-back-health-care-repeal-bill--/1

January 31, 2011
The Judge on Fox News GETS IT!
Judge Andrew Napolitano: FL Judge Rules Health Care Law Unconstitutional
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3OphNrF8apc

Sen. Orrin Hatch Calls Obamacare ‘Dumb-Ass’, ‘Awful Piece of Crap’
http://www.breitbart.tv/sen-orrin-hatch-calls-obamacare-dumb-ass-piece-of-crap/

I Definitely Agree with Sen. Rubio: Obamacare Can't Be Repaired, Must Be Repealed!
http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=1035391191&start=300#!/video/video.php?v=192390937457360&comments

Bachmann: Obamacare Is The "Crown Jewel Of Socialism”
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/01/19/bachmann_obamacare_is_the_crown_jewel_of_socialism.html

Everyone Seems to be "Getting it" Except for the Stubborn Tyranical Obama Administration.  This is Lawlessness and Tyranny!
 
Even Govenor Mitch Daniels "Gets it"

FEBRUARY 7, 2011
An ObamaCare Appeal From the States by Mitch Daniels
Twenty-one governors representing more than 115 million Americans have written to Kathleen Sebelius asking for more flexibility on health-care reform.
Unless you're in favor of a fully nationalized health-care system, the president's health-care reform law is a massive mistake. It will amplify all the big drivers of overconsumption and excessive pricing: "Why not, it's free?" reimbursement; "The more I do, the more I get" provider payment; and all the defensive medicine the trial bar's ingenuity can generate.

All claims made for it were false. It will add trillions to the federal deficit. It will lead to a de facto government takeover of health care faster than most people realize, and as millions of Americans are added to the Medicaid rolls and millions more employees (including, watch for this, workers of bankrupt state governments) are dumped into the new exchanges.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703652104576122172835584158.html?mod=wsj_share_facebook

Yet Even after all of the Exposure and Everyone "Getting it" Here's how the White House Responds to the Federal Court Ruling.

Barack Obama will ignore the court ruling on Obamacare and will implement the law despite its unconstitutionality
February 7, 2011 by Steve Dennis
Unless you only get your news from the mainstream media you know that Obamacare was ruled unconstitutional in its entirety by a federal judge in Florida in a case that was brought against the federal government by a majority of the fifty states. While the internet has been abuzz by this ruling the mainstream media has all but ignored the fact that Barack Obama’s signature legislation was ruled unconstitutional.

And speaking of ignoring the Florida court ruling–the media isn’t the only one who has decided to pretend that this ruling doesn’t exist because the federal government still plans on implementing the unconstitutional law.

When Judge Roger Vinson handed down his ruling I was thrilled, yet at the same time I was dismayed by the fact that he did not issue an injunction to stop the Obama regime from implementing the unconstitutional law. But it turned out that Judge Vinson did not feel–rightfully so–that an injunction was necessary because his ruling was an injunction in and of itself:
http://americaswatchtower.com/2011/02/07/barack-obama-will-ignore-the-court-ruling-on-obamacare-and-will-implement-the-law-despite-its-unconstitutionality/

Obama Invites Crisis If He Ignores Ruling
By BILL WILSON Posted 02/02/2011 06:12 PM ET
The decision by federal judge Roger Vinson striking down President Obama's signature health care law effectively ends ObamaCare unless some higher court overturns it.

In spite of this overwhelming rebuke of the law, some Birkenstock-wearing legal analysts are trying to argue that Vinson's ruling could be ignored by the administration.

That's why this week's action by Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen is so significant. Van Hollen has taken the proper step of following the law, which now says that ObamaCare is unconstitutional in its entirety, relieving Wisconsin of any obligation to follow it.
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/561796/201102021812/Obama-Invites-Crisis-If-He-Ignores-Ruling.aspx

White House Says It Will Implement ObamaCare Despite Judge's Declaration that His Ruling Against It Is 'Equivalent of Injunction'
Monday, February 07, 2011 By Fred Lucas
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/administration-implement-obamacare-despi

Despite the World "Getting it" Obama and His Administration Still Choose to Implement and Secure as Much of Obamacare into Our System as He can.  What a Jerk!  What a Punk!  What a Tyrant!
 
First off. Congress Would've Exempted Themselves from ObamaCare if they Could. I Wonder why that is? I Think We ALL Know why that is. It's Not as close as Good as What they already have now. They Didn't Want to be Forced to have what everyone is BEING FORCED TO HAVE?

The Coburn Amendment to HELP bill would require Congress to use Public Plan. http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20090714/REG/307149981#

Second. Obama and the Democrats Couldn't have recieved Support from the Government employees and Major Labor Unions without Exempting them from having to give up their "Cadiallac Plans" for the ObamaCare BEING FORCED ON US.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Obama_-Dems-cut-deal-to-exempt-union-health-care-from-taxes-8764740-81590182.html#ixzz14Nab4DSu

28 States NOW Want to Block ObamaCare from their States. 20 0f those states involved in this lawsuit are: (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Indiana, Idaho, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah and Washington) along with the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) Va and OK have filed Seperate Cases for their own reasons. A Federal Court Judge has allowed the 20-state challenge to Obamacare to go forward ruling against the Obama Justice Department challenge in a motion to dismiss.
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=39429

There are 28 States Fighting Implementation of Obamacare in their States NOT because they believe it's unfair or a bad bill which it is but that's NOT their Point. They're Fighting this Obamacare Bill because it is ABSOLUTELY 100% UnConstitutional and Should NOT be Forced on the Good People of the United States.

Federal Judges in VA and FL have already Ruled Against Obamacare claiming it was Unconstitutional to force Americans to Purchase Health Care or face penatlies. That's UnAmerican. It is something Foriegn to this Country and Should NOT be Permitted.
Utah Attorney General considers Obamacare UNENFORCEABLE!

February 3rd, 2011 10:19 am MT
SALT LAKE CITY - Following a ruling Monday by a Florida judge that deemed the Obama administration’s healthcare reform program unconstitutional, Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff has decided the ruling is the “functional equivalent” of an injunction, making the policy unenforceable.

US District Court Judge Roger Vinson’s decision was in favor of 26 states who filed suit against the federal government over the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The ruling said Congress could not force individuals over the age of 18 to purchase health insurance. Because the mandate is central to the law, the judge declared the entire act unconstitutional. Utah’s Shurtleff was among the first to file after the President signed the bill into law last spring.

Utah Deputy Attorney General John Swallow declared, “It is our legal opinion that we are no longer bound by the act.” The Attorney General’s office has told Governor Gary Herbert of their decision and he is weighing his options.
http://www.examiner.com/political-buzz-in-salt-lake-city/utah-attorney-general-considers-obamacare-unenforceable#ixzz1FfasDmsE

Idaho "Gets it" also
In the last 6 months, various laws with the objective of “nullifying” Obamacare have been introduced in thirteen states: Arizona, Idaho, Indiana, Maine, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. To date, the farthest along had been Idaho, where a nullification bill declaring Obamacare “void and of no effect” and stopping its enforcement had passed the House and the governor was itching to sign it in to law. But in a victory for common sense and constitutional government, the legislation has been defeated in the Idaho Senate’s State Affairs Committee.

“I find no constitutional justification for the things that we are talking about here today,” said Senate President Pro Tempore Brent Hill. “I commend you for your goals, for the passion with which you pursue those. I cannot pursue them in the manner that some of you are prescribing.”
http://blog.heritage.org/2011/03/02/rejecting-nullification-idaho-draws-the-constitutional-line/


There are 50 States and 28 of them are Rejecting Obamacare and Don't want it enforced, meanwhile 1,000 Businesses, Groups and Organizations Want Waivers from it. You Really think Obamacare is Good or Constitutional?

I Hope Not. Please Reconsider Your thoughts on Obamacare. It is NOT Constitutional or Good for America. We Need Free Market Solutions that are Good and Equal for ALL Americans.

Third. Since So Many are getting these Exemptions and waivers...Why Not give out a Few waivers to McDonalds and 29 Other Companies like Jack in the Box Inc. and the United Federation of Teachers, won't be required to raise the minimum annual benefit included in low- cost health plans covering seasonal, part-time or low-wage employees. The Department of Health and Human Services said it granted waivers in late September so workers with minimum plans would keep coverage without major premium increases.
http://business.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978583237

http://lonelyconservative.com/2010/10/obama-admin-gives-mcdonalds-waiver-on-obamacare/

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10283/1094023-114.stm#ixzz1266XaWX7


Medicare actuary: Reform will cost some seniors
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1010/43529.html

How ObamaCare Guts Medicare The president's pledge that 'If you like your health plan, you will be able to keep it' clearly does not apply to America's seniors http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703649004575437311393854940.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion#

Call Me Crazy but I Think it could be from All of the Regulations Agencies that are coming our way through ObamaCare. Watch this Video which Shows just How Many there will be!
http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=163536966991584&ref=share

Or Maybe it's What else is Hidden inside Obamacare that has them and Everyone Freaking out. And Rightfully so!
http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=159991024030685

When the Federal Government Calls for 16,500 MORE IRS Agents that are Needed to Enforce ObamaCare, I Think that is a BIG Problem and a Huge RED Flag!
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/16500-more-IRS-agents-needed-to-enforce-Obamacare-88458137.html#ixzz14ZXLWUki

But What do the Many Different Polls Say about American's Approval is of ObamaCare? I'm Glad You Asked! :)

Here are ALL of the Polls Showing How Poorly ObamaCare is Percieved Across America:

1. http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/can-republicans-read-polls-obamacare    - CBS Nightly News - On March 22, Americans opposed ObamaCare by 11 points (48 to 37 percent). Now they oppose it by 21 points (53 to 32 percent).

2. http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/how-does-obamacare-poll   -   CNN conducted a poll in the fateful days leading up to, and including, the day of the House vote. It showed that Americans oppose the bill by a whopping 20 percentage points, 59 percent to 39 percent. It also showed why they oppose it: By a margin of 62 percent to 16 percent, Americans think it would raise (rather than lower) their health costs. By a margin of 70 percent to 12 percent, they think it would raise (rather than lower) the deficit. And by a margin of 56 to 16, they think it would result in too much (rather than too little) “government involvement” in health care. These are colossal margins that won’t disappear, or likely even seriously diminish, simply because the text of the bill has now been graced by President Obama’s pen.

3. http://blogs.forbes.com/rickungar/2010/09/16/what-the-negative-polls-on-obamacare-really-tell-us/  - FORBES CBS/NYT Reports - The Affordable Care Act continues to get the big thumbs down from the American public. According to the latest Pollster.com poll of polls, the country lines up solidly against health care reform with 49.3 percent against while only 41 percent favor the legislation.

4. http://blog.heritage.org/2010/03/22/new-cnn-poll-59-oppose-obamacare/  - CNN Poll - A new CNN Opinion Research poll, conducted over the weekend as the House debated Obamacare, finds that 59 percent of Americans now stand opposed to the health care legislation in Congress. Just 39 percent of the poll’s 1,030 respondents said they favored the bill.

5. http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/57588  - Exit Polls Show 48% Want Congress to Repeal ObamaCare.

ObamaCare Doesn't Look Very Good for ANY American. No Wonder 48% of those Registered Voters Wanted Congress to Repeal ObamaCare.

Notice I Said Repeal it! NOT Tweak it! Or Adjust it or Fix it! It Needs to be Defunded, Repealed and Replaced with Free Market Solutions that Benefit Everyone INCLUDING TORT REFORM! Forget about the Trial Lawyers!

There is Hope and a Way to Defund it and Mark Levin Sees DeFunding ObamaCare like this: http://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-levin/how-to-defund-obamacare/449971410945

How to defund Obamacare. You read it here first.
Set forth in this article:
http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1011213

Which is supportive of Obamacare, is the strategy for defunding Obamcare.
The relevant part:
Repeal of the ACA before 2013 is unlikely. Both houses of Congress would have to enact repeal legislation, which President Barack Obama would surely veto. Then,two thirds of both houses would have to vote to override that veto. After 2012, however, repeal could occur if Republicans win the White House and both houses of Congress and stick by their pledge.

Here's More Proof/Evidence of how Obama is Willing to be sneaky and bend the Rules as long as it Advances His Agenda.  This article points out how Obama tried to look like he was heading in the RIGHT Direction FINALLY on Health Care Reform aka ObamaCare but instead it's just an attempt to implement ObamaCare through the back door administratively and adding Single Payer Plans in the process.

Jennifer Haberkorn reports that President Obama's move to allow states flexibility in spending health care funds is the "most significant change" since the law was enacted, and a potential gesture toward critics.

But a source on a White House conference call with liberal allies this morning says the Administration is presenting it to Democrats as an opportunity to offer more expansive health care plans than the one Congress passed.

Health care advisers Nancy-Ann DeParle and Stephanie Cutter stressed on the off-record call that the rule change would allow states to implement single-payer health care plans -- as Vermont seeks to -- and true government-run plans, like Connecticut's Sustinet.

The source on the call summarizes the officials' point -- which is not one the Administration has sought to make publically -- as casting the new "flexibility" language as an opportunity to try more progressive, not less expansive, approaches on the state level.

"They are trying to split the baby here: on one hand tell supporters this is good for their pet issues, versus a message for the general public that the POTUS is responding to what he is hearing and that he is being sensible," the source emails. (This CNN story reflects the public presentation.)

Much of the debate now focuses on the federal government's power, and perhaps health care legislation's critics wouldn't object to single payer -- in Vermont. But the prospect of a backdoor to a single-payer plan anywhere may also sharpen opposition.

UPDATE: An Administration official emails, “Administration official discussed how this legislation would help give states the opportunity to innovate. States have the flexibility to design plans in the way that works for them, so long as they meet the shared goals of reform. That could be any number of proposals from exchanges like the Utah model to other innovations that increase choice and competition.”
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0211/On_call_officials_stress_publi...c_options_in_health_care_shift.html

Britain's Problems with Socialized Health Care with Their HNS System or National Health Service....Some Related Front Page News Articles Written in Various UK Newpapers AGAINST the HNS

Canada's Problems with Socialized Health Care and the Canada Health Act of 1984 which Canada's Parliament unanimously passed and Established a single-payer, publicly-financed health care system...Related Front Page Newpaper Headlines AGAINST Socialized Health Care in Canada.

Let’s Not forget about Barbara Wagner, who is covered through the state of Oregon's government health care plan, was denied an important cancer drug she requested and instead was offered a drug for assisted suicide.

This Really Happened and is the TRUTH! Fact NOT Fiction!

Oregon Health Plan Denies Chemo Medicine- Assisted Suicide Offered Instead
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6ojBgTyA7I&feature=youtube

Obama and the Bureaucratization of Health Care by Sarah Palinby Sarah Palin on Tuesday, September 8, 2009 at 6:34pm
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/note.php?note_id=130481448434&id=24718773587

Sen. Jim DeMint (SC) proposes health-care vouchersby Jim DeMint on Thursday, June 25, 2009 at 7:33am
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/note.php?note_id=96351398402&id=19787180818

I Still Remember when the Republicans did have Alternative Free Market Solutions to Obamacare but were Completely ignored and shut out by Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic Majority in Congress.

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE JOHN BOEHNER'S ADDRESS ON THE REPUBLICAN PLAN
The American people have spoken. They oppose government-run health care. Republicans are on the side of the American people.

I Still Remember when the Republicans did have Alternative Free Market Solutions to Obamacare but were Completely ignored and shut out by Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic Majority in Congress.

What Americans want are common-sense, responsible solutions that address the rising cost of health care and other major problems. In the national Republican address on Saturday, October 31, 2009, House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) discussed Republicans’ plan for common-sense health care reform our nation can afford. Boehner’s address emphasized four common-sense reforms that will lower health care costs and expand access to quality care without a government takeover of our nation’s health care system that kills jobs, raises taxes on small businesses, or cuts Medicare for seniors:

■Number one: let families and businesses buy health insurance across state lines.
■Number two: allow individuals, small businesses, and trade associations to pool together and acquire health insurance at lower prices, the same way large corporations and labor unions do.
■Number three: give states the tools to create their own innovative reforms that lower health care costs.
■Number four: end junk lawsuits that contribute to higher health care costs by increasing the number of tests and procedures that physicians sometimes order not because they think it's good medicine, but because they are afraid of being sued.

ADDITIONAL COMMON-SENSE REPUBLICAN REFORM PROPOSALS
For more information about some of the other common-sense health care reforms proposed by Republicans, please visit the links below:
■Empowering Patients First Act (Republican Study Committee Health Care Reform Bill, introduced July 30, 2009)
■Improving Health Care for All Americans Act (Shadegg Health Care Reform Bill, introduced July 14, 2009)
■Medical Rights & Reform Act (Kirk-Dent Health Care Reform Bill, introduced June 16, 2009)
■Help Efficient, Accessible, Low-cost, Timely Healthcare (HEALTH) Act (Gingrey medical liability reform bill, introduced June 6, 2009)
■Small Business Health Fairness Act of 2009 (Johnson small business health plans bill, introduced May 21, 2009)
■Promoting Health and Preventing Chronic Disease through Prevention and Wellness Programs for Employees, Communities, and Individuals Act of 2009 (Castle Wellness & Prevention Bill, introduced July 31, 2009)
■Improved Employee Access to Health Insurance Act of 2009 (Deal auto-enrollment bill, introduced October 15, 2009)
■Health Insurance Access for Young Workers and College Students Act of 2009 (Blunt bill to improve health insurance coverage of dependents, introduced October 21, 2009)

All of these Alternative Free Market Solutions were Ignored by Pelosi and the Democratic Majority Dominating Congress during Obama’s First TWO YEARS.
Just because they were IGNORED doesn’t mean they did NOT Exist! This is Proof they DID Offer Great Free Market Solutions!
http://www.gop.gov/solutions/healthcare

My point on my next link is proving that most top ten medical breakthroughs come from the United States.  America has the Best Environment to do Research and Development. Our Scientist and Medical Experts are Second to None! Why Damage/Harm that by Changing an unbroken System for one that Historically around the world is SO FLAWED?!
http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1855948_1863993,00.html

Study Shows Gov't Health Care More Expensive Than Private
Research by The Heartland Institute
(April 12, 2009) in Health / Health Care
By Greg Scandlen, Heartland Institute Health Care Expert
I have been remiss in not reporting earlier on an important study by the actuarial form Milliman, issued in December 2008. This study tries to balance the hysteria about cost-shifting from the uninsured to people with private coverage with an analysis of how much cost-shifting is the result of underpayment by Medicare and Medicaid.
The answer, it turns out, is that underpayment by those two public programs dwarfs any problems created by the uninsured.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/study-shows-gov-t-health-care-more-expensive-than-private

Bottomline is Health Care Reform aka ObamaCare is a Bad Bill and Wrong for America.  It's Always been a Bad Idea and Wrong for America, Still IS and Always Will be.  It's UnAmerican! Also UnConstitutional!
Need I say More or Show even MORE Proof?  I'm Sure I Can and Will keep Adding to and updating this Blog.  (As Needed)
Thank You for taking the time to Read this Blog.  Please Share it with Your Friends, Family, Co-Workers, Neighbors and Customers.  This is NOT a Right vs Left Problem or Republican vs Democrat Problem.  It's an American Problem.  A BIG Problem that Needs to be dealtt with IMMEDIATELY or AS SOON AS POSSIBLE! 
Please Help Me Spread the Word about this.  It really IS that Important.