Precise News Ticker

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Cap & Trade aka The Climate Bill or as I Like to Call it "Tax and Kill"


I'm SO Against The Current Cap & Trade Climate Bill that Passed in the House of Congress and is Still Currently in the Senate Waiting to be Pushed through into Legislation.
I DO Call it "Tax and Kill"!
That is EXACTLY What it SHOULD be Called!
That's what this Climate Bill Will Ultimately do to America!
It Will be an MASSIVE ENERGY TAX on Every American Citizen!
It Will NOT Make A Substantive Impact on the Environment!
It Will KILL JOBS!
It Will Cause Electricity Bills and Gas Prices to Sharply Increase!
It Will Outsource Manufacturing Jobs and Hurt Free Trade!
It Will Make You Choose Between Energy, Groceries, Clothing or Haircuts!
It Will Be Highly Susceptible to Fraud and Corruption!
It Will Hurt Senior Citizens, the Poor, and the Unemployed the Worst!
It Will Cost American Families Over $3,000 a Year!
President Obama Admitted “Electricity Rates Would Necessarily Skyrocket” under a Cap-and-Trade program! (January 2008)
Are You Scared or Worried Yet? Well You SHOULD Be!

The House Already has Passed this Bill. Now it just needs to go through the Senate and then finally the President has to sign it into Law. And Believe Me when I Tell You that Obama is Anxiously and Impatiently Waiting to Sign This Legislation into Law too!
What Would Global Warming Regulations Do?
■Lieberman-Warner: Last year, the Senate rejected cap-and-tax legislation that would have capped CO2 emissions 70% below 2005 levels by 2050. A Heritage analysis of that bill found startling economic impacts.
■Markey-Waxman: The cap-and-trade tax proposed by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA) would double down on last year’s failed scheme, bringing in trillions of dollars in taxes, making it one of the largest sources of revenue for the federal government.
■Six Hundred Hurricanes Couldn’t Cause This Much Economic Damage: In the first 20 years, Lieberman-Warner would have destroyed nearly 3 million jobs, caused some manufacturing sectors to cut jobs by 50% and generated up to $300 billion per year in government revenue while reducing income by nearly $5 trillion. For comparison, this is equal to the economic damage done by over 600 hurricanes …and the Markey-Waxman bill is worse.
■Green Jobs Are a Myth, Real Job Losses are Not: For every “green job” created, others are wiped out. Job losses resulting from the Lieberman-Warner cap and trade would have surpassed 900,000 in some years. Keep in mind that this is net of any “green jobs” created.
■New Version, More Expensive: Markey-Waxman will be much more costly than the bill rejected by the U.S. Senate last year. Such an expensive tax on all Americans is bad under normal circumstances and worse during a recession.A “Carbon Constrained Future”
■The Ultimate Outsourcing: India and China have repeatedly said they would not match U.S. environmental goals in order to protect their economies. Cap and Trade will merely move manufacturing jobs to China and India.
■By 2100: By EPA calculations, the Lieberman-Warner bill would have at best resulted in a global drop in temperature of only 0.1 to 0.2 degrees Celsius by the year 2100.
■A Carbon Tax Would Be No Different: Alternative carbon taxes share the central flaw of any other carbon reduction scheme. Similar to cap and trade, a carbon tax would cause significant economic damage and would do very little to reduce global temperatures.
■An Alternative That Supports American Taxpayers: Instead of appeasing a radical environmental agenda, President Obama should give us access to all energy sources, including domestic oil production, nuclear energy, coal, and new renewable fuels. Instead of new taxes, the President should instead aim to lower gas and electricity prices. When government impediments are lifted, America’s energy entrepreneurs can develop innovative and market-driven solutions to our energy needs.
Still Not Scared or Concerned about this Massive Piece of Legislation that Our Current Government is trying to Rush into Law?

Check Out Some of these 34 Links I've Found when I was Researching This Cap-and-Trade Climate Bill:
2. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123655590609066021.html - Wall Street Journal ArticleHint: They were promised a tax cut during the Obama campaign."An economy-wide tax under the cover of saving the environment is the best political moneymaker since the income tax."
5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpNcBPLhclI – Glenn Beck’s Take on Cap & Trade Bill
6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIy6UqpF4SI - Mark Levin on Cap and Trade
10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mchkiym-Ydc – Mark Levin with Eric Cantor just after the Cap and Trade Bill Passes in the House
17. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lumPeXxSI5c – John Boehner Filibusters Cap and Trade Bill
30. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uymXCJ9Zovk - Mark Levin Interviews John Boehner
31. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrHRA09FX6M - Mark Levin Calls Out the 8 Republicans Who Voted for Cap and Trade Bill in Congress
32. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgWxfkpIbEU - Mark Levin Talks with Mike Pence about Cap and Trade on the Floor of Congress During Climate Bill Vote

If Those 34 Links Don't Help Give You More Info or Have Shown You Just How Dangerous and Damaging this Bill Will be to America, I'm NOT Sure What Will.I'll End on this Note.
This is NOT a Popular Bill among Most Americans or Congressmen in the House!
Only 8 Republican Congressmen Voted For This Bill.
The Rest Voted Against it or in Representative Flake's Case of AZ DID NOT Vote which in My Book is the Same as Voting for it.
It's Clear this Bill is Descructive and Damages America in Major Ways.
It Grows the Size and Strength of Government over Our Life.
When has that EVER been Helpful or Positive?
Please Take Some Time and Go Through these Links.
Do the Same research I did.
Then Let Me Know What You Think. Thanks!

My Thoughts on Manmade Global Warming aka Climate Change..It's a Hoax!

I Personally Choose to Believe that Manmade Global Warming aka "Climate Change" is a Hoax.
It's a Lie.
It Simply Does NOT Exist.
Al Gore, The UN and the UK have ALL Bought into this Lie.
My Opinion and Belief is that There is NO Significant Man-Made Global Warming or Climate Change at this Time, there has NOT been any in the past and there is little reason to fear any in the future.
I didn't say that the activities of man do not alter the weather and climate, because it is clear they do. What I said there is no significant man-made climate change and none should be reasonably expected to occur in the future.The science behind this current global warming, man-made climate change commotion, has failed to verify. The hypothesis that our carbon footprints produced by our use of fossil fuels is producing a significant greenhouse effect that will lead to climate calamity has failed to verify. So I repeat, there is no significant man-made global climate change.
I have studied the research papers of the United Nation's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and examined the science presented by Al Gore in his books, his movie and his power point. I have traced the history of the development of the concept of carbon dioxide in the exhaust from our cars, power plants and industrial plants entering the atmosphere and interacting with the primary greenhouse gas, water vapor, to magnify warming. It all collapses into a failed theory when examined with scientific care.
I am not alone in reaching this conclusion. In the past year, 34 thousand scientists, 10 thousand with PhDs, have signed a statement debunking global warming. There is solid scientific evidence that by burning fossil fuels our civilization increases the amount of carbon dioxide, CO2, in the atmosphere. However, even after 150 years of burning fossil fuels, CO2 remains a tiny trace gas. To be precise only 380 molecules out of every one million are CO2. Scientists with an anti-fossil fuel agenda developed a theory of radiative forcing to explain how this trace gas could create runaway greenhouse warming. They put that theory into general circulation computer models. Their models then projected a continuous rapid rise in global temperatures year after year. In the 1980s and 1990's the models seemed on track as temperatures climbed. But in 1998 the warming stopped. By 2002 a rapid cooling had begun. That cooling continues today. The computer proof has failed. It has become clear the warming in the 80s and 90s was at the peak of a solar cycle and now that the sun has gone very quiet, cooling has gripped the planet. Yet the models continue to predict warming that is not happening. There is no significant warming from CO2.
I am painfully aware that global warming has become a political issue.
I deeply regret that.
I want to make very clear my conclusion is in no way politically based.

In the 1970's when there was a similar flurry of excitement about a coming Ice Age. Thankfully our government and political parties didn't get involved so when the science got things straightened out, the frenzy faded away. Unfortunately, this time people with the anti fossil fuel agenda had jumped on the global warming bandwagon and just won't let go. They have calmed the rhetoric to climate change, but they are still all wrapped up in cap and trade to tax our use of fossil fuels. This will do great harm to our economy but do nothing of consequence to protect the environment.Reject the extremist agendas and concentrate on your wonderful work protecting our natural resources and making natural experiences available to us citizens of today and generations to follow.I'd like to see the Special Tax-exempt Status Granted to Environmental Groups Elimated, since they're NOT NonPartisan Charitable Foundations.Eliminate Special Statutory Authority Granting Environmental Groups Standing to Bring Lawsuits on behalf of the Public, since their Main Purpose is to Pursue the Statist's agenda through Litigation.Fight ALL Efforts to use Environmental Regulations to set Governmental Industrial Policies and Diminish the Nation's Standard of Living, such as "Cap-and-Trade" to Regulate "Man-Made Climate Change."But Don't Just Take My Word on this.
Check Out The Link Below at John Coleman's Link. See What John Coleman Thinks, Writes and Says about Manmade Gobal Warming aka "Climate Change".
http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner - A Great Source About Global Warming
You've Got to Go to This Link and Read What John Coleman Writes about Al Gore and Global Warminghttp://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/38609397.html
John Coleman's Remarks Before The International Conference on Climate Change in 2009http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/41029077.html
John Coleman's Remarks Before The International Conference on Climate Change in 2008http://media.kusi.com/documents/REMARKS+OF+JOHN+COLEMAN+FINAL6c.pdfJohn Coleman's Open Letter to Environmentalistshttp://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/12661711.html

But I Don't Only Listen to or Believe ONLY What John Coleman Thinks, Writes or Says. John Coleman is a Great Source of Reference though. John Coleman was the Founder of the Weather Channel.
There are Many Scientists Who Agree With John Coleman and Me too!
Here are TWO Great Links that Clearly Show Massive Opposition to Al Gore's Claims to Manmade Global Warming aka "Climate Change"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfHW7KR33IQ – John Coleman Suing Al Gore with 30,000 Scientists (9,000 Phds) For Global Warming Fraud
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/29/weather-channel-founder-blasts-gore-global-warming-campaign/

Here are Some Rasmussent Polls Showing What Americans Generally Think about Manmade Global Warming aka "Climate Change"
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/56_don_t_want_to_pay_more_to_fight_global_warminghttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/50_favor_building_more_nuke_plants_in_u_shttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/only_34_now_blame_humans_for_global_warminghttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/53_say_u_s_should_build_more_nuclear_power_plantshttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/60_stress_need_for_new_sources_of_energy_32_favor_conservationhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/issues2/articles/54_say_media_hype_global_warming_dangershttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/october_2008/voters_see_conflict_between_growth_and_the_environmenthttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/an_inconvenient_perception_voters_say_gore_plan_unrealistic_costlyhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/issues2/articles/47_say_global_warming_very_serious_problemhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/general_current_events/62_say_develop_alternative_sources_of_energy_12_favor_conservationHere'shttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/50_favor_building_more_nuke_plants_in_u_shttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/only_34_now_blame_humans_for_global_warminghttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/53_say_u_s_should_build_more_nuclear_power_plantshttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/60_stress_need_for_new_sources_of_energy_32_favor_conservationhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/issues2/articles/54_say_media_hype_global_warming_dangershttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/lifestyle/general_lifestyle/october_2008/voters_see_conflict_between_growth_and_the_environmenthttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment/an_inconvenient_perception_voters_say_gore_plan_unrealistic_costlyhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/issues2/articles/47_say_global_warming_very_serious_problemhttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/general_current_events/62_say_develop_alternative_sources_of_energy_12_favor_conservationHere's

Some More Great Links of Related Articles about Global Warming aka "Climate Change"http://www.ft.com/cms/s/c2896b88-77bd-11de-9713-00144feabdc0,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=

http://www.rightnation.us/forums/index.php?showtopic=158448

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8150415.stm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WJynIeWkf4

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-climate-bill-carbon-trading-scam-of-the-century.html

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=114

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/04/green-lobby-guides-democrats-on-climate-bill/

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change http://www.ipcc.ch/

The Al Gore movie, “An Inconvenient Truth http://www.climatecrisis.net/

An online article about the word “deniers” used to describe Global Warming skeptics http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/1782/

United Nations IPCC Chapter 9, the key chapter on CO2 Forcing http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter9.pdf

Natural Resources Defense Council Global Warming report http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/fcons.asp

Michael Mann and the Hockey Stick Chart http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Mann_(scientist)

Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick’s Paper refuting the Hockey Stick Chart http://www.climateaudit.org/pdf/mcintyre.grl.2005.pdf

Stephen McIntyre’s website http://www.climateaudit.org/

I Hope this Blog Helps to Give You More Information about Manmade Global Warming aka "Climate Change". That is My Intent. I Want More People to be Informed and Educated about this Issue and NOT just Accept Manmade Global Warming aka "Climate Change" as Fact just because it is Widely Accpeted by Al Gore, The UN, UK and The Mainstream Media. Haven't We Learned Enough Over The Years NOT to Trust/Believe Anything and Everything We Read but to do Our Own Research to Determine What the True Facts Really are.