Precise News Ticker

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Why Conservatives Won't Support or Vote for Representative Ron Paul for President EVER!


I would like to start this Blog off by saying some things that are Nice and Great about Ron Paul so the Ron Paul Supporters can't attack me for saying NOTHING Nice about him.


Here is What We Know about Ron Paul:

Ronald Ernest “Ron” Paul (born 20 August, 1935) is a paleolibertarian 10th-term Congressman, a former Air Force Flight Surgeon, a medical doctor (M.D.) and a 2008 presidential candidate from the U.S. state of Texas. As a Republican, he has represented Texas's 14th congressional district in the U.S. House of Representatives since 1997, and had previously served as the representative from Texas's 22nd district in 1976 and from 1979 to 1985.
Dr. Paul has delivered more than 4,000 babies. He and Carol, who reside in Lake Jackson, Texas, are the proud parents of five children and have seventeen grandchildren. Ron Paul is a Baptist.

In Congress Ron Paul has proposed doing away with personal income taxes, federal antitrust laws and the minimum wage. He advocated pulling the United States out of the United Nations, NATO and the International Monetary Fund. Republicans ignore him; most of his bills fail to attract a single co-sponsor.

However in 2009 he has attracted over 300 votes for his bipartisan proposal to subject the Federal Reserve to unprecedented scrutiny by allowing the Government Accountability Office to audit all central bank operations, including its decisions on interest rates, lending to individual banks and transactions with foreign central banks. He has a separate bill to abolish the Fed altogether. (He is the lone sponsor.)

Paul is a pro-life states' rights libertarian, also known as a paleolibertarian. Paleolibertarians advocate a limited role of government, low taxes, free markets, strict construction of the U.S. Constitution, and a return to monetary policies based on commodity-backed currency. He has earned the nickname "Dr. No" for voting against any bill he believes violates the Constitution.

Ron Paul is noted for his authorship of the We the People Act, an act which removed the ability of the US Supreme Court to hear cases involving discrimination based on sexual orientation or religion. He is also noted for submitting several bills banning abortion, and somewhat controversially was the only person to oppose the Darfur Divestment Act of 2007, a bill which disallowed the US government, corporations, and individuals from sending money to or doing business with the janjaweed rebel group of the Sudan.

Ron Paul's desire to secure U.S. borders remains a key topic in his 2008 presidential campaign. He opposes the North American Union proposition and its proposed integration of Mexico, the United States of America, and Canada. Paul voted "yes" on the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which authorizes the construction of an additional 700 miles of double-layered fencing between the U.S and Mexico. Paul opposes illegal immigration as well as amnesty for illegal immigrants.

That's about Everything that is Actually GOOD about Ron Paul. Now I Must Show You the BAD SIDE of Ron Paul that His Loyal Supporters Don't want You to Know about:

Michelle Malkin Exposed Ron Paul for the "Truther" that HE REALLY IS!! Ron Paul's Own Words and on Video!!
Trutheriness and Ron Paul • May 19, 2007 11:08 AM
http://michellemalkin.com/2007/05/19/trutheriness-and-ron-paul/

Ron Paul is also ABSOLUTELY Racist and Anti-Semitic! Read this Blog and Decide for Yourself!
http://www.sundriesshack.com/2008/01/09/ron-pauls-racist-newsletter-and-the-libertarians-that-excuse-it/

The neo-Nazi organization Stormfront also provided widgets on its internet site to enable people to electronically donate cash to Paul's campaign. Stormfront's founder, former Ku Klux Klan member Don Black, also gave financial support to Paul's campaign.

Ron Paul wants to "reinstate the Constitution and restore the Republic." He rejects a welfare state or nanny state role for the federal government, and advocates a strong non-interventionist foreign policy.

He voted against the Iraq War in 2002 and has offered alternatives such as granting the President authority to grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and arming pilots. He is the only Republican presidential candidate to have voted against the Iraq War.

On March 5, 2008, Ron Paul was the only member of the house to vote against a bill "Condemning the ongoing Palestinian rocket attacks on Israeli civilians, and for other purposes"

Ron Paul seemed to have dropped slightly in the polls that followed the second Republican debate in Columbia, South Carolina, to 25 percent. This was probably as a result of his suggestion that weekly bombing of Iraq following Operation Desert Fox in December 1998 may have contributed sufficiently to Arab anger at the United States as to make the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks inevitable. Paul was excoriated by Rudy Giuliani, who said that this was the most bizarre explanation for the attacks he had ever heard. Other Republican commentators sought to explain Paul's continued strength in post-debate polls as the result of multiple votes by his supporters or voting by non-Republicans. In response to Rudy Giuliani, the next day at the National Press Club, Ron Paul offered Rudy a book list to read regarding the issue of American foreign policy. These books are Imperial Hubris by Michael Scheuer, Dying to Win by Robert Pape, Blowback by Chalmers Johnson, and The 9-11 Commission Report by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks.

The Newest Updated Info on Ron Paul:
Ron Paul Is A Vicious Anti-Semite and Anti-American and Conservatives Need To Wash Their Hands of Him - by David Horowitz  *Posted on February 17 2011 1:25 pm*
Long ago Bill Buckley drummed the anti-Semites out of the conservative movement, and the movement thrived as a result. But the Jew-haters have returned. For years the Texas crackpot, Ron Paul, has been attacking America and Israel as imperialist powers — the Great Satan and the Little Satan, and calling for America’s retreat from the battle against our totalitarian enemies. At the recent CPAC conference Paul’s Jew-hating storm-troopers swarmed the Freedom Center’s table to vent their spleen against Israel as a Nazi state. Now Paul is making a priority of withdrawing aid for Israel — the only democracy in the Middle East and the only reliable ally of the United States. Here is an alert from Gary Bauer about the amendment Ron Paul is proposing which may be voted on today.


Thursday, February 17, 2011
To: Friends & Supporters
From: Gary L. Bauer

Special Alert

Representative Ron Paul (R-TX) has just introduced an amendment to end all U.S. aid to Israel. The amendment could be voted on before the day is over. I need your help right now to stop this ill-conceived proposal!

Please click here to quickly and easily send a message to your elected representative urging them to stand with Israel.

Don’t be deceived. This Ron Paul proposal would not lower our budget deficit. By abandoning Israel while its enemies are gaining strength, the risk of a major war in the Middle East would increase. A major war would cost the U.S. billions and billions of dollars as we have already seen in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The U.S. gives billions of dollars a year to foreign countries that hate us and regularly vote against us at the United Nations. But, Israel votes with the U.S. 97% of the time. They are a loyal ally that shares our values. The aid they receive is used to buy military equipment from U.S. companies so the money comes back to us. Ron Paul’s proposal makes no sense.

Please right now go to http://www.cwfpac.com/ to tell your congressman to stand with Israel.

You may also call the Capitol Hill Switchboard at 202-224-3121 and ask for your representative’s office. If you don’t know his or her name, give the operator your zip code and they will transfer you. Tell them to stand with our most reliable ally Israel by opposing the Paul amendment to end all foreign aid. Please take action now!
http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/02/17/ron-paul-is-a-vicious-anti-semite-and-anti-american-and-conservatives-need-to-wash-their-hands-of-him/

Why I Don't Like Ron Paul by Politicons.net Posted March 2nd, 2011 9:13 AM by Henry D'Andrea


After releasing my Top 5 GOP frontrunners list for March, many Ron Paul supporters were very unhappy not seeing him in the top five. They left tons of comments complaining that I didn’t include him and saying he is the only true hope for 2012. As most of my regular readers know, I do not like Ron Paul, and I support Sarah Palin for President. So, to not seem biased, I wanted to tell you why I don’t like Ron Paul. However, not to leave you in the cold, in terms of 2012, if he were the Republican Nominee, I would support him.


First off, many Republicans are strongly pro-American defense, and Ron Paul is not just anti-war, but he has adopted some of the more obnoxious and inflammatory rhetoric from the Left about the war that is extremely grating. Hell, according to Paul, Iraq is a war for oil and empire, engineered by neocons, and in Paul’s book, we deserved to be attacked on 9/11. That is not Conservative at all, and quite frankly disgusting. I do not want the President of the United States with that mindset. Additionally, Paul’s inconsiderate, “we must leave immediately, regardless of the consequences,” position on Iraq comes across as poorly thought out. Even though Paul is opposed to the war, the disengaging of the United States from the war immediately and without consequences is very thoughtless. It’s something you might hear from a Liberal college student at an anti-war rally. Even President Obama and Secretary Clinton, all whom have spent months trying to convince America that they’re the most anti-war of all, have said we may be in Iraq for years to come, though Obama has set a date for withdraw.

Secondly, Paul wants to get rid of the CIA. Are you kidding me? The CIA is vital to our national security. Ron Paul believes that the CIA “runs everything.” He has also suggested in the past that the CIA has conducted a “coup” in America.

There’s been a coup, have you heard? It’s the CIA coup. The CIA runs everything, they run the military. They’re the ones who are over there lobbing missiles and bombs on countries. … And of course the CIA is every bit as secretive as the Federal Reserve. … And yet think of the harm they have done since they were established after World War II. They are a government unto themselves. They’re in businesses, in drug businesses, they take out dictators … We need to take out the CIA.

Well Mr. Paul, have you introduced any legislation to stop CIA funding, or demanded any hearings? No. Also, I think the military would laugh at the notion that they take orders from the CIA. They take orders from the President and are accountable to Congress. I know this, because I’m a rational American and not a conspiracy theorist.

To not continue on with my bashing of Ron Paul, I wanted to say one last point. For whatever reason, Ron Paul has more obnoxious supporters backing him than Sarah Palin, Mitt Romney, and Mike Huckabee combined. If you write a column or a post knocking: Palin, Romney, or Huckabee, you’ll certainly have some people disagreeing with you. However, If you knock Ron Paul, you’ll often have hordes of social misfits making obnoxious comments, spamming your polls, touting conspiracy theories, insulting conservatives in general, and doing everything possible to make nuisances of themselves. I can already guarantee, the first comment on this post will be totally slamming me and saying something like Ron Paul is for Liberty and he’s the best for 2012. If he is the best, why did he lose in 1988 and 2008?

In final, not to completely degrade Ron Paul, he is committed to a smaller government, slashing spending, liberty, and the Constitution. Which are all points I support. However, those few arguments I brought up lead me into not supporting him in a GOP primary. I know after saying this, I’ll get crap from his supporters, but if he decides to run in 2012, he’ll lose in the primary. Sure he can win every straw poll or online poll, but that’s because his support website’s completely bomb them with Paul supporters. In all truth, he should remain congressman of Texas’s 14th district.
http://politicons.net/why-i-dont-like-ron-paul/


Posted on February 17 2011 1:25 pm 
Ron Paul makes Public Statements like these that are Anit-War that Conservatives Don't Agree with or believe:
http://www.votesmart.org/speech_detail.php?sc_id=637609&keyword=&phrase=&contain

America has gone on to WIN the War in IRAQ and this is no longer an issue to the American people.

The IRAQ War did Not Bankrupt America's Economy. Domestic Discretionary Spending is what is Destroying America's Economy.

Here's another Public Statements like these that are Anit-War that Conservatives Don't Agree with or believe:
Perpetual war is expensive.
http://www.votesmart.org/speech_detail.php?sc_id=633197&keyword=&phrase=&contain

Again, America has gone on to WIN the War in IRAQ and this is no longer an issue to the American people.

Many Conservatives DO NOT AGREE With Ron Paul on the Stated Issues Below:

Ron Paul Wants to Greatly Decrease Spending on Military Budgets exept for Pay for Active Duty and Armed Forces personnel training which He Would Support Slightly Increasing Spending in those two areas.

Ron Paul thinks America SHOULD have diplomatic relations with the government of Cuba.

Ron Paul says "No foreign aid is authorized in the Constitution."

Ron Paul Thinks The US should use military force only when the US border or territories are attacked or American citizens are in danger.

Ron Paul Thinks "The War on Drugs has failed. The Fed. gov should turn the responsibility over to the states."

Ron Paul Believes More in a Police State like the America nder Bill Clinton BEFORE 9/11. Ron Paul says about Terrorism "State law enforcement agencies should be more independent. Fed should have less jurisdiction."

Ron Paul Does NOT Support United States Military Action in Afghanistan.

I Found All of these Answers about Ron Paul at: http://www.votesmart.org/npat.php?can_id=296

IF You Are NOT Interested in seeing Ron Paul in Youtube Videos, then You may want to skip this next middle section of this Blog down to the Bottom where I Give MY BOTTOM LINE!

I Do Enjoy Showing Videos and Other Great Articles/Posts Related to Ron Paul though!

Mark Levin's 5 million $ challenge to Ron Paul
This is a Challenge that Mark Levin KNOWS with NO DOUBTS that He’ll Never have to Pay because Ron Paul is Unbalanced and Unreliable. What Mark Levin says about the Founders being Conservatives was Right also. The Libertarians Hate that Fact but it is Fact from our History and You can’t Change or Re-Write History. It is what it is!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hv1_yMQtS0&feature=related

I happen to Agree with Mark Levin about Ron Paul in this Youtube Video.
Does that make Me a “NeoCon” like the Video says of Mark Levin with the Music of “True Colors” playing in the background?

Mark Levin: Ron Paul Should Not Be President, Palin Qualified To Be President
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRhhO7qrBcg
I Don't Like Ron Paul, Never Have and Never Will. Ron Paul had His Chance to Run for President back in 2008. I Believe Paul came in Dead Last in Each and Every Single STATE!! America Rejects Ron Paul and His Supporters are Rude, Obnoxious, UnCivil, Mean, Vile Malcontents! I'm Sick of Ron Paul and His Supporters.
http://www.newsrealblog.com/2011/02/17/ron-paul-is-a-vicious-anti-semite-and-anti-american-and-conservatives-need-to-wash-their-hands-of-him/

Ron Paul is not just anti-war, but he has adopted some of the more obnoxious and inflammatory rhetoric from the Left about the war that is extremely grating. Hell, according to Paul, Iraq is a war for oil and empire, engineered by neocons, and in Paul’s book, we deserved to be attacked on 9/11. That is not Conservative at all, and quite frankly disgusting.


In this Youtube Video Interview, Ron Paul can't Help but continue his message of Blame America for all of the problems in the middle east.  Just watch how many Times Ron Paul says it's America's Falt int his Interview.  This is Important because it's SO WRONG!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C756NOPyDA

This is another Youtube Video where Ron Paul goes off the rails and speaks incoherently about "Foreign Interventialism"  Ron Paul Does NOT Want to Support Israel or Defend Israel.  That's all there is to it.
The BIG Part that Ron Paul is Badly Missing is the Part where Israel NEEDS Our Help/Support and Israel WANTS Our Help/Support.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4Jn2xCF92Y

Ron Paul: Israel Encouraged and Started Hamas  This Video Really Speaks for itself.  Ron Paul in His Own Loony Words on Video.  Undeniable!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFaSzU9XF5o

Ben Stein Accuses Ron Paul of Anti-Semitism on Larry King
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOV0qCW7nBA&feature=related

Terrorism: Ron Paul vs. Giuliani @ SC Debate - Ron Paul explains the damage that an interventionist policy can have when it comes to violent blowback.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD7dnFDdwu0&feature=related

Ron Paul on Gaza 1-3-09 These Youtube Videos are easy to find.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08gTWqWrI4M

Here are Youtube Videos of Ron Paul Expressing Exactly How He Feels about Legalizing Drugs.  Ron Paul is Famous for and Well Known in the Younger College Age Crowd for His Stand Against Reagan's "War on Drug"  and You Wonder why so Many Young People are flocking to Ron Paul?

Ron Paul debates war on drugs supporter
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0EFfE_hvC_c

Ron Paul vs Stephen Baldwin - Marijuana Fight
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xR-LUWHRzIo&feature=related

Ron Paul "War on Drugs "
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmBciOsNWHo&feature=related

Ron Paul on Drugs and Prostitution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypYBfvnwBTc

Arguements to legalize drugs and prostitution - This is what Many Libertarians Believe that Many Conservatives DON'T!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p88C3M1wqkE&feature=related

Ron Paul on Drug Legalization
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEhQepWZ3LA&feature=related

Ron Paul - War on Drugs a "Complete Failure"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvFYCky0muY&feature=fvwrel

Ron Paul on marijuana, prohibition, and personal freedom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0GZznxMC14&feature=related

Here are some Youtube Videos of Ron Paul's Opinion about 9/11.  You decide IF Ron Paul is a Truther or Not:

Ron Paul 10-17 on Alex Jones Show Infowars NWO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-oDBYSkXLiA

Ron Paul talks about the Bilderberg Group
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plo-1rLZ3Jo&feature=related

Ron Paul on The Alex Jones Show"Opportunity for True Freedom in 2012!!"1/2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=andtgH9Nflo&feature=related

Ron Paul: First Bush Was Working Towards New World Order
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8DpKKSmaa8&feature=related

Glenn Beck talks about NWO with Ron Paul
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nODyj8H68TA&feature=related

Ron Paul Bashes the New World Order at Rally in Nashville TN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDXHbgpoI80&feature=related

Ron Paul: The Deep Dark Details (2 of 2) -
The video the Paleoconservative "Libertarians" don't want you to see.

Ron Paul admits to writing the bigoted newsletters in 1996, claiming the quotes were being taken out of context:
http://reason.com/blog/2008/01/11/old-news-rehashed-for-over-a-d

Stormfront radio endorses Ron Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBz_7yrJKq0

Ron Paul voted against the Rosa Parks medal and then lied to the public and said it was tax payer funded. Paul cosponsored the Boy Scouts Commemorative Coin Act, that would give $3,500,000 of the proceeds to a homophobic organization. Hypocrisy? To add to the BSCCA, Paul also attempted to introduce legislation to give every cold war veteran a gold medal. The cost of this? $240,000,000. And unlike the Rosa Parks medal, these medals actually would have been tax payer funded.

Rosa Parks medal of honor legislation:
http://www.pdfdownload.org/pdf2html/pdf2html.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffinancialse...

Boy Scout Commemorative Coin Act legisaltion: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-5872&tab=summary

Cold War veterans medals legislation:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.3417:

More on former KKK Grand Wizard Don Black endorsing Ron Paul:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22331091/

Tom G. Palmer article on Lew Rockwell and his creep racist cult:
http://tomgpalmer.com/2005/01/21/racism-and-bigotry-delivered-courtesy-of-lew...

Jamie Kirchick who broke the newsletter story on Tucker MSNBC:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWpADkP4QqY

More info on National Socialist Randy Gray, Paul's former Midland Country Coordinator in Michigan: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/15/17443/1121/935/437394

Paul held a fundraiser for Bill Johnson, another one of Paul's White Supremacist friends; who he endorsed for the Los Angeles County Court. It turns out Johnson wanted to have all non whites deported from the US. "Coincidentally," Ron Paul wants to end birthright citizenship, therefore spitting on the Constitution he claims to admire. We all know the easiest way they scan immigrants! It's usually based on skin pigmentation.

More info on Ron Paul endorsing racial separatist Bill Johnson: http://opinion.latimes.com/opinionla/2008/05/judicial-candid.html

More on Ron Paul wanting to end birthright citizenship: http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2007/11/ron_paul_drops_an_ant... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T-iJKwskH4

"Meet the Press" Tim Russert NBC interview where Paul says he would repeal the Civil Rights Act: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-iJP4BAAQ4

"Situation Room" Wolf Blitzer CNN interview regarding newsletters:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKBlk1Vpeuw

Ron Paul voted NAY on MLK holiday:
http://wwsword.blogspot.com/2008/01/proof-ron-paul-voted-nay-to-mlk-day.html

Ron Paul's against the Civil Rights Act which ended state segregation of blacks: http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul188.html

Ron Paul's response to the newsletters becoming public in 1996:
http://reason.com/blog/show/124339.html

Paul only had four employees at his Texas Headquarters where the newsletters were distributed, and only seven others around the rest of the country:
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:JR05RqhoRiEJ:www.reason.com/news/show/124...

Ron Paul and the homophobic We The People Act:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59ZaP9Akswo&feature=PlayList&p=03799F1...

"The Trouble With Forced Integration" by Ron Paul:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul188.html

Various photocopied issues of Ron Paul's bigoted rants and conspiracy theories:
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/ron-paul-newsletter

Great video by Buddhagem on Ron Paul:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b61VR-GACMA

Ron Paul And His Rally For Racism And Terrorism!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnPqS1pKBjc

Proof Ron Paul is Racist
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4pHcgjTngs

Ron Paul shows his true racist colors
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAm2bDfnHaY&feature=related

OK I Think I've Shown Enough Proof about just HOW and WHY Conservatives Won't Support or Vote for Ron Paul for President.  Not Now!  NOT EVER!!

Bottom Line on Ron Paul:
Some Conservatives say they Agree with Him about 90% of the time and actually Like the Guy as a Person. I’m NOT One of those Conservatives. I Find Myself in Agreement with Ron Paul to be somewhere around 70% on Ron Paul’s Best Day.
Ron Paul is Who he hangs out with. Ron Paul is Fine with Associating Himself with Racists, Extremist and Anti-Semites. Even IF He’s NOT Any of those things Personally. The Rotten Apples DO Spoil Him because they’re Funding Him and Propping Him up as the Savior of America. What America? What kind of America Would that look like? IF the Saying is True about “You are Who You Hang out with” than Ron Paul Will Never be able to crawl out or Away from the Dark Shadow of Followers Who Support Him. Never. They’re Fanatics and Zealots of the Worst kind. He Refuses to distance himself from these people. That’s Morally and Ethnically Wrong in My Humble Opinion.
Ron Paul doesn’t have to accept Contributions or Endorsements from ANYONE or ANY GROUP that He’s Uncomfortable with or Disagrees with.
Has Ron Paul Openly and Publically Denounced ANY of the People or Organizations that I have Mentioned above? If so, When? Where did he do this? I’d Argue He hasn’t and He Won’t. Those are HIS PEOPLE. America Rejects Ron Paul’s People and Him.


One Final Point about Accepting/Rejecting Ron Paul as a President.
What may be Great and Passes as Acceptable as a Congressman/Senator or even Governor of a State is NOT the SAME Bar or Standard We Should use to Decide IF they are Solid Quality Presidential Candidates or NOT.
What May Work for Any State or District a Candidate May be representing is Definitely NOT the same as Representing ALL AMERICANS as President.
We Need to and MUST have Much Higher Standards that We Hold Presidential Candidates due to the Fact that Whoever Finally Wins the Nomination Will be Widely Considered the Most Powerful/Influential Person in the Modern Free World and the Added Responsibility of Commanding the World’s Most Powerful Military as Commander in Chief. This is NOT to be taken lightly!
It Requires a Well Rounded Candidate that has More Qualifications than just being a Good/Decent Congressman/Senator or Governor.
Executive Experience does count and makes a difference but it’s NOT Everything.
The Same can be said of Ideology/Philosophy.
My Presidential Candidate MUST be as Conservative as Possible meaning He/She MUST have Solid Conservative Principles, Values and Morals to Win My Support, Endorsement and Vote.

Ron Paul is Terribly lacking in some Key Areas that Conservatives Demand.
Without the Conservative Base behind Ron Paul, He can’t Win the Nomination or Against whatever Left Wing Radical Liberal Democrat that the Democrats all line up behind.
John McCain has taught America this Great Modern Day Lesson of Needing the Conservative Base of the Republican Party to WIN the Presidential General Election. And to do that, HE MUST be More Conservative which at this stage of His Life and Professional Career, He is Unwilling to do.

Friday, February 18, 2011

What Illegal Immigration is Costing America/Americans



I'm going to keep this blog as simple as possible in an effort to reach as many people as possible on this highly important issue facing each and every single honest, hard-working, tax-paying, legal American citizen today.  
Illegal Immigration is a huge problem and I will break down exactly how costly it is every year.   
IF You are one of these Americans who don't think Illegal Immigration is a huge problem.  
You need to see exactly how much Illegal Immigation Costs America/Americans every year.
$338 Billion a Year on Illegal Immigrants is too much to ignore! Amnesty is going to Cost Tax Paying American Citizens AT LEAST $2.6 Trillion!

Isn't that reason enough for any elected official to be in support of sealing the border and enforcing our rules of law?
You'd think so wouldn't You. Amnesty Will Cost U.S. Taxpayers at Least $2.6 Trillion

The Heritage Foundation Welfare Tab for Children of Illegal Aliens Estimated at $600M in L.A. County 

I Bring up these Costs because Many Americans but NOT a Majority are Still UnEducated/UnInformed or Flat Out Ignore the Damage being done by Illegal Immigration. A Border Fence like the Border Fence Constructed down in San Diego was Approved by the Majority of Americans Who Demanded their Representatives in DC to Fund Building a Border Fence Along the Sothern Border.  

President Bush Actually Caved in towards the End of His Presidency and Signed a Border Fence Bill into Law to begin Building this Fence. 


President Bush this morning signed into law a bill authorizing the federal government to install fencing, cameras, motion sensors and other types of barriers to stem illegal immigration along 700 miles of the U.S.-Mexican border."This bill will help protect the American people. This bill will help make our borders more secure," Bush said before signing the legislation."We have a responsibility to secure our borders," Bush added. "We take this responsibility seriously."We're modernizing the southern border of the United States so we can assure the American people we are doing our job of securing the border." President Bush signed into law Thursday a broad measure that calls for fencing a third of the 2,100-mile border between the United States and Mexico.  "This bill will protect the American people, this will bill make our borders more secure. It is an important step in immigration reform," Bush said from the White House Roosevelt Room before putting pen to paper. Bush was joined by Vice President Dick Cheney, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, House Majority Leader John Boehner and several other lawmakers and administration officials.

Bush said the United States is a nation of immigrants but also a nation of laws."Unfortunately, the United States has not been in complete control of its borders for decades, and therefore, illegal immigration has been on the rise. We have a responsibility to address these challenges, we have a responsibility to enforce our laws, we have a responsibility to secure our borders. We take this responsibility seriously," Bush said.

The Secure Fence Act of 2006 gives the secretary of Homeland Security 18 months to get "operational control over U.S. international land and maritime borders" by improving surveillance through personnel and technology as well as "physical infrastructure enhancements to prevent unlawful border entry and facilitate border access by U.S. Customs and Border Protection." The measure provides for at least two layers of reinforced fencing and the installation of additional barriers through 700 miles of portions of California, Texas andArizona. The legislation also demands the secretary report to appropriate committees in Congress on its progress and "the necessity, feasibility and economic impact" of the construction. It also gives the Department of Homeland Security the authority to decide where to use the fencing and where to use the department's preferred option of a virtual fence comprised of cameras, vehicles barriers, checkpoints, lighting and motion sensors, which officials say is more economical and just as effective. New Hampshire Republican Sen. Judd Gregg estimates that about half the 700 miles will actually be fence.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates the project will cost roughly $2.2 billion, or about $3.2 million per mile. Other Liberal Lamestream Media Sources Confirm this Event Really Happened also.  

Before and After Bush Signed the Border Fence Bill into Law to be Built, it had the Large Majority of Support of the American People because Most Americans Understand this Important Issue.  
Support for Mexican border fence up to 68% By Rasmussen Reports Published: 2:33 PM 07/29/2010



Build it and they won’t come: 68% of American voters want a border fence August 1, 2010

The Better Part of 56% have this issue Right, the other have don't have a Clue!56% Oppose Justice Department Challenge of Arizona Immigration Law - Rasmussen Reports™

Don't Get Much Higher than 85% on Most National Polls! 85% is about as close to a Majority of American Citizens as You can get! Wake up Politicians & give the American People what they Want! 85 percent of Americans want combat troops sent to the border - Immigration Reform Examiner

Still this Border Fence has NOT been Completed Yet.  Why is that?  You May ask.   It wasn't lack of Effort on the Part of Republicans in Congress like SC Senator Jim DeMint.  

Here I'll List at Least Five Separate instances where Jim DeMint Fought/Argued FOR this Border Fence to be Funded and Constructed.  
1. Finish the Border Fence Now - Posted May 27, 2010 
2. DeMint to attach border fence language to financial bill - By Jordan Fabian - 05/05/10 04:07 PM ET 
3. DeMint Wants Mexican Border Fence — as Part of FinReg Bill  - May 6th, 2010 
4. Jim DeMint Wants to Finish Mexican Border Fence — as Part of FinReg Bill - By Mike Lillis 05.05.10  - 6:15 pm 
5. Senate defeats DeMint's bid to finish U.S.-Mexico border fence  - By James Rosen McClatchy Newspapers - Posted on Thursday, May 27, 2010 WASHINGTON —

The Senate late Thursday defeated Sen. Jim DeMint's bid to require completion of a 700-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border within a year.  
So Who Stood in the Way of the Funding and Construction of this Border Fence?  I'm Glad You Asked!  

Border Fence Project Placed on Obama’s Back Burner - Monday, June 21, 2010 OBAMA CUTS TARGET MILITARY, FALLEN POLICE, THE BORDER FENCE AND MAYBE MEDICARE John G. Winder, The Cypress Times Published 05/08/2009 - 4:22 p.m. CST 

Obama Administration Pulls Plug on ‘Virtual’ Border Fence Posted on January 14, 2011 at 9:51pm Senate Approves Border Spending Bill, Heads to Pres. Obama for Signature Friday, August 13, 2010, 7:51 AM EST - posted on NumbersUSA 

Obama administration ends high-tech border fence By SUZANNE GAMBOA, Associated Press Suzanne Gamboa, Associated Press – Sat Jan 15, 3:12 am ET Obama Administration ends work on border fence - February 18, 2011 

Obama administration scraps border fence Critics say project didn't boost security and was waste of taxpayer money 1/14/2011 8:34:55 PM ET 2011-01-15 T01:34:55

Why Did the Building of the Border Fence Stop? - By Jeff Lukens - Published 06/14/2010  

Again I Will Remind You that AT LEAST 56% of Americans Are Against Obama's Opposition to Building the Border Fence.  

Here is the Poll Proving this AGAIN! The Better Part of 56% have this issue Right, the other have don't have a Clue! 56% Oppose Justice Department Challenge of Arizona Immigration Law - Rasmussen Reports™


How does President Obama Reward Homeland Security when it doesn't Secure the Border or Enfore America's Rule of Law?  
How about with a BIG FAT RAISE!  You heard Me Right!  

AZ Sheriff's thinks Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, is in a "Trace" I Think She's Smoking Something ESPECIALLY Since She used to be the Previous AZ Governor before Jan Brewer took over for her when Obama picked her to head up The Homeland Security Position. Arizona sheriff says Janet Napolitano “in some trance” about border violence - National drug cartel. 

Now I want to Address the Good Intentioned, Good Natured Americans Who Wish to Think that Most if Not All the Illegal Immigrants Coming Across Our Southern Border Illegally are ONLY doing so for Legal, Justified Reasons like "Do jobs that Americans Won't do" to "Provide for their Families in the Land of the Free"  America is, INDEED, The Land of Free, Home of the Brave and also the Land of Opportunity.  It's all of that and then some.  It is these things for those Who come Here LEGALLY the RIGHT Way.  Legal Immigrants are Treated with Respect and given Every Opportunity as other American Citizens.  No Living in the Shadows or picking lettuce for LEGAL IMMIGRANTS unless that is what they Freely Choose to do.   Here are Some Related Articles of What else comes across our Borders and Border Related issues.  

87% of illegal Mexican immigrants caught have criminal records  I hope people will take the time to not only watch this, but to really pay attention to what those of us in AZ have been trying to warn about: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPrl4P9AcrQ&feature=player_embedded  

It's OK for Mexico to Secure their Border with Guatemala but America Can't Secure Our Southern Border Against Mexico? Rediculous!! 

I May Add More Related Articles at the end of this Blog in the Near Future so Please Feel Free to check back ont his blog every once and a while for UPDATES. 

Thank You for taking the time to Educate/Inform Yourself on Illegal Immigration and the Mexico Border Fence.  Like I Said in the Beginning, this is a HUGE Important Issue for Each and Every Single American Citizen Who is Hard-Working, Tax-Paying, Law-Abiding, Country-Loving, Legal, Patriot.  Demand Congress to Continue to Pressure this President and the Next in 2012 to FINALLY "BUILD THE BORDER FENCE!"  It's Long Overdue and Anyone/Everyone Who has Now Read this Can't Claim to be Ignorant or UnIformed Anymore on this Issue.


Tuesday, February 8, 2011

IF a Library was Dedicated to Obama....



IF a Library was EVER Dedicated to Obama & His Presidency, What on Earth Would it Look Like? And What on Earth Would be inside of it? What Would it consist of? Obama hasn't Accomplished ANYTHING of Sustance. No Historic Value to talk about or put on a Pedastal. Seriously though. What would a Library Dedicated to Obama Possibly look like?


It would have to have a Bowling Alley in it since Obama Sucks SO BAD at Bowling, He Really Needs the Practice.

Then You'd also have to put in a Pitching Mound so Obama could Practice HARD at throwing a Baseball like a MAN instead of how he threw that first pitch at the baseball game in front of Millions of Viewers. How Pathetic!!

Let's Not Forget to put in a Basketball Court so Obama could actually look halfway decent shooting hoops. (That's about ALL that Obama is Decent at doing)

Don't Dare Forget to put in the Country Club Golf Course in a Very Secretive Place inside the Library Where NOBODY Could EVER be Caught Dead seeing Him tee up a Golf Ball.

You'd also have to include a Nice, Quiet and Secluded Smoking area where the President can continue His Habit while Preaching to others that its NOT Good for You and You Should NOT be Smoking.

There'd also have to be a Huge stage for ALL of Obama's Liberal Entertainers to fly in for Private Concerts for Him and His Family.

Not to Mention the Biggest Kitchen for the Top Chiefs/Cooks that would have to fly in also to prepare the BEST Food. Nothing but the Finest for this First Family!

What about a Huge Designer's Closet to Show off and Showcase ALL of Michelle's Designer Label Clothes that she Wore during her time in the White House. That's all the Press/Media seem to Care about and find Important. These clothes on display in the closet SHOULD also have to have the Price Tags showing just how Much Michelle was Willing to Slurge Every chance She got to get some of the Finest Clothes. You Only Live ONCE! Right?

Last but Not Least, there'd have to be an Organic Garden for the Obama family to Grow Healthy Foods. Not to eat but because it's the Right thing to do for the planet. Gotta be "GREEN". Meanwhile they're Stuffing their faces with the Greasiest Heaviest Foods they can get their hands on.

There could also be Various Photos and Pictures covering the walls of this Library and in Brightly Lighted Showcases of Obama & His Family signing UnConstitutional Bills and Mandates on the "Little People".

I can see it now but where would this Library be Built and called Home to? Chicago? Hawaii? DC?

How about Martha's Vinyard or in Europe somewhere where they've Vacationed like Spain?

I Know where IT WON'T be Located!

NO WHERE IN THE SOUNTHERN STATES BUT ESPECIALLY AZ where Obama is Still fighting SB1070 and ObamaCare Against the Will of the People in AZ.

I just Don't Know? If You have ANY Ideas....I'm ALL Ears but so is Obama! I''m Sick of thinking about this because it's making me Physically Sick. :P

Monday, January 24, 2011

Can Someone be "Too Conservative" to Run for Public Office?

Can Someone be "Too Conservative" to Run for Public Office?


I've heard this statement far too often by too many people. I have to address this issue.
Every time I hear this from people I know, the lamestream media or strangers I bump into around Town I have to cringe and grit my teeth alittle bit. It bothers me and rubs me the wrong way big time!
The term "Too Conservative" doesn't make any sense to me at all.
How can anyone be considered or labeled "Too Conservative"?
I honestly believe that you're either Conservative or you're not.
Being called "Too Conservative" by someone is the same as being called "Too American" or "Too Patriotic".
If someone is claiming to be a Conservative and campaigning on Conservative Principles, what's the problem?
Why are some challenging this candidate?
If someone is campaigning as a Conservative and fights for Limited Government, Cutting Taxes and Free Market Solutions for the problems facing America today, What's the problem?
Why are some still challenging this candidate?
If someone is campaigning on Limited, Responsible and Constitutional Government, What's the problem?
Why are some still challenging this candidate?
I still hear some people say things like "Palin shouldn't run for President because she's Too Conservative" or "Christine O'Donnell didn't win her Senate seat because she was Too Conservative" I think these are very ignorant or naive statements to make. Especially if you identify yourself as a Conservative, a Tea Party Patriot a Republican or a right leaning independent. This is just unacceptable language out of an educated, informed and intelligent person to say. Those who know should know better than to allow such foolishness slip out of our mouths.
What makes people say such foolish things like this anyways?

These people in the media or around town in your personal life who say things like this expose themselves as the people who are not Conservative enough or Patriotic enough or American enough to boldly stand up and defend Conservative Principles as they know they should be. It's their guilty Conscience for their lack of articulation or crediable defense of Conservatism that makes them say things like this.

I think it stems from lack of a solid foundation of what a Conservative is, what Conservatism is and what the Tea Party Movement is about. There's no other excuse or reason one could express such nonsense without a strong grasp of what Conservatism is or who a Conservative is.

I know there are many of my so called FaceBook "Friends" on here that claim to be Conservative or challenge my view of Conservatism. That's fine but Conservatism wasn't born yesterday. It has a rich American Proud American History.

June 15, 2009
"Conservatives" Are Single-Largest Ideological Group
Percentage of "liberals" higher this decade than in early '90s
Thus far in 2009, 40% of Americans interviewed in national Gallup Poll surveys describe their political views as conservative, 35% as moderate, and 21% as liberal. This represents a slight increase for conservatism in the U.S. since 2008, returning it to a level last seen in 2004. The 21% calling themselves liberal is in line with findings throughout this decade, but is up from the 1990s.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/120857/conservatives-single-largest-ideological-group.aspx

Election 2010: Polls show that more voters consider themselves conservative
Exit polls showed a surge of voters identifying themselves as conservative. Nationally, the electorate was more conservative than in 2006 by nine percentage points and more so than in 2008 by seven points. Poll findings in swing states mirrored those numbers, with Ohio showing an 11-point rise in conservative voters and Wisconsin a 10-point increase.
Pollsters had been predicting stronger enthusiasm on the right than on the left for much of the year, and the conservative base did not disappoint.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/03/AR2010110305474.html

Just take a Quick Look at the 2010 Mid Term Election Results to See How Well Conservative Tea Party Candidates did on November 2nd 2010. It was "Historic"!
http://news.yahoo.com/page/2010electionsdashboard

Tea Party candidates win key races
NATIONAL RESULTS
November 03, 2010
By Nedra Pickler, Associated Press
Washington - — Voters embraced the Tea Party's conservative throw-the-bums-out anthem in key races across the country, with the movement's favored candidates taking more than a dozen House seats held by Democrats, three Senate races and the South Carolina governorship.

The movement did not make a complete sweep despite a strong anti-Democratic climate, with the most prominent losses coming from Tea Party stars Christine O'Donnell of Delaware and Sharron Angle of Nevada. Angle couldn't overcome Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and O'Donnell was soundly defeated after old videos emerged of her discussing witchcraft, masturbation and mice with human brains
http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-11-03/news/24810390_1_tea-party-key-races-democrat-chris-coons

'Tea party' candidates win GOP contests in Delaware, New York
In New Hampshire, an establishment-backed Republican appears to be fending off a challenge from the right.
September 15, 2010
By Kathleen Hennessey and Michael A. Memoli, Tribune Washington Bureau

The insurgent "tea party" movement vanquished the Republican Party establishment Tuesday as an underdog candidate for U.S. Senate in Delaware won a primary that had become a national proxy war for the heart of the GOP.

Conservative activist Christine O'Donnell, a perennial candidate with no experience in elective office, defeated longtime Rep. Michael N. Castle — a dramatic finale to a primary season dominated by the small-government movement's revolt against moderate elements of the GOP.
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/15/nation/la-na-primary-roundup-20100915

How did Sarah Palin's Candidates that she Endorsed do in the 2010 Mid Term Elections?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/palin_tracker/

My Main Point about Conservatives and Conservatism is Today's Conservatives are the MAJORITY and the Liberal Democrats are THE CULT MINORITY! That can Not be Stated Enough!

We Who Identify Ourselves as Conservatives or Tea Party Patriots or Conservative Independents or Whatever Need to Find Our backbones and Spines NOW!

We're the Loud, Proud, Vigilant & Resolute Patriots Who are Holding the Line in Defense of what Most of us grew up beleiving in Traditional All-American True Blue Conservative Principles. We have Nothing to be Afraid of or Ashamed of.

We're the Patrick Henrys, Paul Reveres and James Madisons of Our Generation Who are Standing Tall & Speaking Out Against the Big Government, Big Spending Tyrants of Our Time. This is Our Time to Protect Our Families, Friends, Neighbors, Co Workers and Customers by INFORMING & EDUCATING them about the Agenda to Steal Away their Rights, Freedom and Liberty that so Many Have Fought Bravely and Courageously & Died for. We owe it to Past Generations and Future Generations to be Good Stewarts of this Nation. We Owe Our Fore Fathers as Well as Our Future Kids, Grandkids and Great GrandKids to Stay Ever Resolute and Most Vigilant in Our Efforts to Thwart Our Radical Liberal Progressives Who Wish to Change America into something America was Never meant or Intended to become.

Look My Definition of Who a Conservative is:
A Conservative is a Person of Faith Who Believes as the Founding Fathers Believed as Written & Signed in the Declaration of Independence that "All Men are Created Equally, Endowed with Unalienable Rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. Every Single Signer of the Declaration of Independence Believed in GOD and Creating a Civil Society of Liberty and Freedom of Religion NOT From Religion. The Constitution was Written to Limit Government's Power & Authority with 3 Branches for Checks & Balances. Conservatives are Originalists Who Believe in keeping Government's Power & Authority Enumerated as Defined by THE CONSTITUTION. To be a Conservative, You have to Believe in God, the Constitution and Keeping the Government's Power & Authority Enumerated. Less Government, the Better. Less Taxes, the Better. The Federal Government's Principled Responsibility is to the CITIZEN. Each and Every Single American Citizen should expect it's Government to Provide a Strong National Defense from attacks by both Foreign and Domestic. That is the Form of Government the Founding Fathers Instituted with the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Conservatives Believe as they Believed.

You're either Conservative or You're Not. Forget being a "Constitutional Conservative" or "American Conservative" Those are two silly nonsense Made up Titles. You're either Conservative or You're Not. No Need to put further titles in front of the word Conservative. You either ARE a Conservative or You're Not. Just leave the Word the way it is. It's Fine just Perfect the way it is.

Adding qualifiers does not change who one is, nor should it be necessary. In fact, I tend to get a little suspicious when people feel the need to add qualifiers to their conservative title. Remember GW Bush's 2000 campaign when he adopted and popularized the term "Compassionate Conservative"? I cringed when I first heard that. True conservatives already know that conservatism is compassionate (at least as much as an ideology can be). I know he was trying to reach out to a broader bunch of folks, and maybe it worked. But I was left with feelings along the lines of "if I have to explain it to you, you wouldn't understand". As it turned out, Mr Bush was not the staunch conservative I had hoped he would be, and in fact may be partly responsible for the miserable state of the national GOP with their ongoing reluctance to abandon political moderation and move back to the solid right where they have previously succeeded.

If one is a staunch conservative, they ought to proudly proclaim they are conservative. Without qualifiers. And without apologies.

And then when they are elected, they should prove their conservative credentials every day, regardless of what protests their handlers and the middle-of-the-road GOP throw at them. Because if one is a true conservative, then they should also have the CAJONES to act like one. Do what is conservative, and do what is right (yes, that is redundant). And if they don't, then they don't get my vote again.

We Conservatives are battling a widespread image that to be conservative and to be republican are the same thing. I think the term "republican" is almost meaningless anymore. I don't think the same about the term "Conservative", except when it is viewed (all too often) as synonymous with republican. My answer to that is to make it clear to anyone who cares that I am a conservative but not a republican. That one can be a republican and not be a conservative (which is what comprises a majority of the GOP today).

President Ronald Reagan understood the Power of Words. He framed the debate on HIS Terms.
"How can Limited Government & Fiscal restraint be equated with lack of compassion for the poor? How can a tax break that puts a little more money in the weekly paychecks of working people be seen as an attack on the needy? Since when do we in America believe that our society is made up of two diametrically opposed classes--one rich, one poor--both in a permanent state of conflict & neither able to get ahead except at the expense of the other? Since when do we in America accept this alien & discredited theory of social & class warfare? Since when do we in America endorse the politics of envy & division?”

Reagan dissected the Statist's language & recast the morality of the message. Americans are Not at war with each other over money & class. And when Americans keep the fruits of their labor, it is a Good thing. This is both seminal & fundamental. The Statist's Vocabulary provides the Conservative with opportunities to highlight the Statist's duplicity & the bankruptcy of his ideas by stripping the rhetorical veneer from his message & contrasting it with the wisdom of the Conservative's Principles. The battle over language, like the battle over ideas, is one Conservatives should relish.

There's Probably Some Who are Reading this Note and May think Conservatives are More or Less than What I Described it to be. Some are probably Right and others Wrong. The Great Thing about being a Conservative is WE"RE ALL INDEPENDENT FREE THINKING INDIVIDUALS Who DO Disagree with each other on Many Occassions. That's to be expected with ANY LARGE GROUP of People. No Large Group is Perfect and Nobody can put a Perfect Definition on ANY Large Group. There are Differences but they SHOULD NOT Divide US or Pit one Conservative Against another over Our Differences.

I'm Not Looking for People to Agree with Everything I Say in this Note but to Understand that NOW is NOT the Time or Place in Our History to Bicker and Debate about Our Candidates Who Choose to put their Personal & Private Life on Hold to Campaign/Run as a Conservative for Public Office if We do in Fact Call Ourselves Conservative or Tea Party Patriots or Right Leaning Independents.

It's WRONG! It's Counter Productive and Destructive to the Conservative Movement to Take Back Our Country from the Radical Liberal Progressives Who Wish to Further make America into the Foreign Country it already has become! When it Should NOT have EVER been taken this Far as it is!

What We as Fellow Conservative Patriots Need to be doing and SHOULD be Doing is Supporting, Endorsing, Campaigning for and Donating Our Time and Money for these Candidates instead of Knee-Capping and NaySaying these Candidates Can't Win because they Champion Conservative Principles & Run as OutSpoken Conservatives ala Karl Rove, Chris Christie and National Websites Like NRO and The Weekly Standard. These Candidates Need Our Support, Encouragement, Time and Money More so than the Cookie Cutter GOP Establishment Moderate Types that the GOP Continues to support and back despite the Massive Defeats the GOP took Nationwide in the Mid Term Primaries of 2010.

What Good or Productive Outcome will be Produced from Knocking or Doubting these Conservative Candidates when they Run for Public Office?

I'm Not asking or Telling or Even Preaching to Blindly Follow Any Candidate that Claims to be Conservative when Running for Public Office on their Word but LOOK TO THEIR PRINCIPLES and See Where they Stand on THE ISSUES before Announcing Publicly what Your Concerns or Objections are to these Conservative Candidates. If and When they are found to be Phoney or Frauds, these Candidates Should be and MUST BE Exposed for Who and What they Really are.

I'm Not going to Stand in the way or Obstruct Anyone from saying the TRUTH and Presenting FACTS about Conservative Candidates Who aren't Really Conservatives. We Should be doing this on a Regular Basis and NOT Afraid or Ashamed to do it. Too Many RINO Republicans Like to Claim to be Conservative or Tea Party Candidates in Election Years when it's Fashionable to do so but THEIR PRINCIPLES and STANDS ON THE ISSUES Tell the REAL STORY! That should Remain the FOCUS!

My Final Plea to those Who Still Wish to Say these kinds of Harmful, Destructive and Counter-Productive Statements about Conservative Candidates Who May be Running for Public Office in 2012, Please bit Your Tongue with Your Skepitism about these Future Brave Conservative Candidates. Let's give them the Benefit of a Doubt before Casting Our naysaying Stones of Doubt if they can Win or Not.

America is Ready as Always to Elect Conservatives to Lead this Nation NO MATER WHERE YOU LIVE! I Must Remind You Again that President Ronald Wilson Reagan Lost At both the 1968 and 1974 Republican National Conventions before Beating President Jimmy Carter in 1980 and then Senator Walter Mondale Jimmy Carter's Vice President in 1984 in TWO MASSIVE LANDSLIDE VICTORIES in BLUE STATES, PURPLE STATES as Well as the Red States. Sure Reagan wasn't Perfect and made Mistakes. But Reagan was the Most Popular Modern Day Conservative President EVER Elected! Reagan Should Continue to be the Standard the Future Conservative Candidates Look to. Reagan Proved that America is a Conservative Nation as Long as We have a Strong, Passionate, Articulate and Resolute Conservative Leader Leading it.

Conservative Candidates have lost and Will Loss from time to time just as every other group or category has and does all of the time. Conservatives Can't Win Every Race or Battle but if they're True to their Conservative Principles, We Should be Supporting them with Our Voices, Time and Money. They are Representing YOU, Your Family, Friends, Neighborhoods and this Great Country.

My Point about the Reagan Comparison is that even Our best Example wasn't Successful at first but Stayed the Course & Eventually Won over the American People. That's how Victories are Achieved the Right way in America. Through Hard Work and Tons of Efforts. The Left isn't going to slow down, quit or hand over America to us. We Shouldn't Expect them to either. They Won't. They have a Right to be Wrong in this Country as We Do to be RIGHT but the Difference is We're on the Side of Justice, Freedom, Liberty, Personal Responsibility, Rule of Law and Private Property Rights. While they're Fighting for Bigger Government, More Regulations, More Taxes and Less Personal Responsibility.

We're on the RIGHT SIDE of History! We Will Win the War but We MUST Continue the Battles by Supporting the Solid Conservatives Who Choose to Stand up, Speak Out and Run to Represent Us in Public Office.

Let's Support these Candidates! Not Knock them! Undermine them! Redicule them! Or Underestimate their Effectiveness in the Marketplace of Ideas.